Does the lawyer have the right to refuse to appear in court if the court fails to inform the lawyer of the opening time according to the legal time?

According to the law, a lawyer should receive a notice of hearing from the people's court three days before the hearing. As for the way of service, there are various ways, and it is rarely served directly by the court. It can be delivered by mail. More often, it is notified by the judge by phone or conveyed by the defendant's family. The mode of service stipulated in China's procedural law has lagged far behind the development of the times, and lawyers do not need to ask the court for direct service. Telephone notification is indeed the most economical way of service. Although it is not allowed by law, there is no mandatory prohibition in procedural law. Therefore, as long as the parties appear in court on time according to the telephone notice, there will generally be no objection. However, if one party fails to appear in court, the court will not dare to make a judgment by default. However, the lawyer received the notice to appear in court within 3 days before the court session. If he was fully prepared, he would not have to argue with the court, nor would he have to know the reason for the late notice, but he would still appear in court on time. If the preparation is not sufficient, the lawyer has the right to ask the court to change the date of the trial. In some courts, the judge, the court session time and the court occupied are all decided by computer at the filing stage, so lawyers can't negotiate the court session time with the judge, but most courts can't do this for the time being. After the case arrives in court, the lawyer should take the initiative to contact the judge and ask about the estimated court time. If the lawyer decides another trial time. If the lawyer has decided to reopen the court or for other objective reasons, he should greet the judge in advance and try to stagger the time. If a lawyer receives more than two notices of hearing on the same day or the notices received conflict with each other, he shall write an application for postponement of hearing and bring the notice of hearing to the judge. Judges usually promise to change the time, but sometimes they will meet two unreasonable judges who insist that the other party change the time and put the lawyer in the middle. Faced with this situation, all china lawyers association came up with a plan of "consultation with the parties and proper solution". Such a move is actually no move. Negotiate with the client, terminate the contract halfway, and let others hire another lawyer, or with the consent of the client, the law firm will send another lawyer to appear in court. However, changing the generals at the last minute will make the client very angry. Therefore, lawyers should not negotiate with clients, but should argue with judges. Lawyers who find important evidence clues before the court session need further investigation and evidence collection or apply for new witnesses to testify in court. If they cannot complete the task of evidence collection or get in touch with witnesses before the court session, they may also apply to the court for an extension of the court session. If the people's court does not allow it, lawyers still have the opportunity to apply. During the trial, the defense lawyer still has the right to apply for notifying new witnesses to appear in court, obtaining new material evidence and applying for re-appraisal or inquest. Lawyers should arrive at the court on time at the trial time notified by the court. If you go to a foreign court, you'd better arrive early, find the street where the court is located, and inform the judge that you have arrived. There will be a quiet night to familiarize yourself with the case again.