Defendant Zeng, male, 1983, born in dengzhou city, Henan Province, was born on March 23, 2003. On August 1 1, 2003, he was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment and fined 3000 yuan by the People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen. In June 2008, 1 1 was released from prison. He was criminally detained on June 6, 2009 on suspicion of robbery, and was arrested according to law on June 25 of the same year. He is now in dengzhou city detention center.
Defendant Jiang, male,1was born in Yichang City, Hubei Province on June 6, 1987. He was criminally detained on June 6, 2009 on suspicion of robbery, and was arrested according to law on June 25 of the same year. He is now in dengzhou city detention center.
The People's Procuratorate of dengzhou city accused the defendants Zeng and Jiang of robbery with indictment No.376 (2009) of Deng Jian Chu Zi, and filed a public prosecution with our court on July 27th, 2009. On the same day, our hospital filed a case, applied summary procedure according to law, conducted a separate trial, and heard the case in public. Defendants Zeng and Wu appeared in court to participate in the lawsuit, and the trial of this case has ended.
Dengzhou city People's Procuratorate accused: On the morning of June 16, 2008, the defendants Zeng and Wu robbed the handbag carried by the victim Wang Moumou near Liulin Bridge in dengzhou city, which contained a bird mobile phone (worth 570 yuan) and cash 280 yuan. In view of the above facts, the procuratorate provided relevant evidence, believing that the actions of the defendants Zeng and Wu constituted the crime of looting, and requested to be sentenced according to law.
Defendants Zeng and Jiang have no objection to the criminal facts alleged in the indictment.
It was found through trial that on the morning of June 16, 2008, the defendants Zeng and Wu drove a two-wheeled motorcycle to rob a handbag carried by the victim Wang Moumou near Liulin Bridge in dengzhou city, which contained a Bird mobile phone (worth 570 yuan) and cash 280 yuan.
The above facts were confirmed by the following evidence submitted by the procuratorate, and were cross-examined and certified by the court: the defendants Zeng and Wu confessed the time, place and process of driving motorcycles in cooperation with each other, which mutually confirmed the robbery process stated by the victim Wang Moumou. In addition, the procuratorial organs also submitted household registration certificate, arrest certificate, criminal judgment, notice of release from prison, seized articles, list of documents, price appraisal conclusion and other evidence. The above evidence was verified by our hospital and adopted by our hospital.
Our court believes that the defendants Zeng and Wu robbed others' property by driving motor vehicles, and the amount was relatively large, which constituted the crime of robbery. Dengzhou city People's Procuratorate accused the defendants Zeng and Jiang of committing robbery and supported them. The defendant was a recidivist and should be severely punished according to law. According to the provisions of Article 267, Paragraph 1 of Article 25 and Paragraph 1 of Article 65 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the verdict is as follows:
1. The defendant committed robbery and was sentenced to one year's imprisonment and fined 3000 yuan.
Second, the defendant Jiang committed robbery, sentenced to six months in prison and fined 2000 yuan.
(The term of imprisonment shall be counted from the date of execution of the judgment. If a person is detained before the execution of the judgment, one day of detention shall be reduced to one day of imprisonment. That is, the term of imprisonment of the defendant Zeng: June 2009 16 to June 2065438 15; Defendant Jiang's prison term: June 6, 2009 to February 5, 2009. The fine shall be paid within 30 days after the judgment takes effect. )
If you refuse to accept this judgment, you can appeal to Nanyang Intermediate People's Court through our court or directly within ten days from the second day of receiving the judgment. If a written appeal is filed, one original and two copies of the appeal shall be submitted.