First, the lawyer's independent defense opinion is a legal right. Criminal suspects also have the right to find lawyers to defend themselves. Because the relevant laws of the country are also based on humanitarian principles, now criminal suspects may touch relevant laws or endanger public safety, but they will still be asked to find lawyers to defend themselves, because this will also minimize the punishment for these people. So lawyers also have the right to defend their clients. The independent defense opinions of lawyers are actually the legitimate rights and interests of lawyers. In criminal cases, lawyers should defend their clients accordingly, which is also a procedure.
Second, it will not cause dissatisfaction with the presiding judge. Now that Bian Xiao has said above, an independent defense opinion is the lawyer's right to defend the client in court. That is to say, in this process, the presiding judge also needs to listen to the opinions of defense lawyers, so the independent defense opinions of lawyers at this time will not cause dissatisfaction of the presiding judge, because these words or evidence submitted by defense lawyers will actually let the presiding judge conduct the trial. In other words, the presiding judge himself will make a judgment on this information, then comprehensively consider it and finally make a judgment.
Three. Conclusion In fact, Bian Xiao thinks that whether a case will be beneficial to the parties depends on the progress of the whole case and whether the evidence submitted will be helpful to the parties, which has nothing to do with his defense lawyer in court.