2
Editorial: "Hearing Professionals" Tear the fig leaf of the hearing 2011July 17 07:36 Beijing News [Weibo] Editorial I want to comment on (56) Font size: T | T
■ editorial
Since the consumer representative itself is fake, the whole hearing can only be fake in the end, and such a hearing has become a purely paper-based form.
Every time they were selected by random drawing, they participated in 19 hearings in seven years. In the past two days, it was revealed on the Internet that there are four "price hearing professionals" in Chengdu, and one of the old women actually participated in various hearings 19 times, which caused netizens to madly forward the pat on the brick, calling it "represented", and some even called it Chengdu hearing. (Yangcheng Evening News July 16)
Cheating by hearing representatives is common in hearing chaos. The most common means is to let insiders pretend to be consumers. But like Chengdu, even "child care" is fixed. An old lady can attend the 19 hearing for seven years, which really deserves the title of "the best hearing representative in history". No wonder consumers are "represented" by such die-hard price increase supporters. Faced with external opposition, they can get 100% price increase support rate at every hearing.
"People live to occupy and consume resources, so it is reasonable for the government to charge any fees." I don't know if such a "famous saying" is Mrs. Hu's real idea, or if it was bought against her will; But what is certain is that this statement is not only irrational, but also not representative at all. If she is occasionally drawn to "represent" consumers, it is the helplessness of consumers; However, she was drawn 19 times, and successively supported the price increase of water, taking a taxi, limiting the daily fare, and buying a car by lottery. So I'm afraid there is only one possibility of black-box operation.
"Hearing professionals" will attend every hearing, and the number of hearings will increase, which is undoubtedly a kind of hearing fraud with the lowest cost. As long as you spend a little kindness to buy it, the hearing will be smooth. The original intention of the price hearing system is to respect public opinion and provide a platform for peer-to-peer game. However, since the consumer representatives themselves are fake, the whole hearing can only be fake in the end. This kind of hearing is reduced to a purely paper-based form-the existence of "hearing professionals", which completely tears the fig leaf of price hearing.
The "childcare" of the hearing may be difficult to get better because of the anger and scolding of netizens. What's more, as long as there are loopholes in hiring "child care", the relevant departments have to expand the team of "hearing professionals" from four to 400, and then "draw lots at random" from them. Therefore, the most important thing is to fundamentally improve the hearing system and punish hearing fraud with strict legislation and accountability.
For example, improve the procedures for the generation of hearing representatives, formulate a unified national method for the generation of hearing representatives by lottery, and ensure the representativeness of hearing representatives. For example, it is clearly stipulated that as long as the hearing is flawed, the price increase motion will be rejected by one vote, and the responsibility for fraud will be strictly investigated. No, even if there is enough evidence to prove that the hearing is fraudulent, it will not affect the implementation of the price increase plan at all.
If the fence is tightened in the system, the "hearing professional households" will naturally lose the market and the hearing will be able to establish credibility.
three
cause
On 2011June 2 1 Sunday, a netizen named "Guo Meimei Baby" on Sina Weibo received much attention. This 20-year-old girl who claims to live in a big villa and drive a Maserati is actually the commercial general manager of China Red Cross Society, and her real identity is also controversial. Some netizens said that she was the daughter of Guo Changjiang, vice president of China Red Cross Society.
Guo Meimei
Guo Meiling and Weibo are nicknamed "Guo Meimei Baby" from Hunan. 20 1 1 On June 20th, 2008, Guo Meiling publicly flaunted his luxurious life on the Internet, and claimed to be the commercial general manager of the Red Cross Society of China, which caused an uproar on the Internet. On June 22nd, the China Red Cross Society said that "Guo Meimei" had nothing to do with the Red Cross Society, and Sina also apologized for the mistake in real-name authentication.
detail
"Today, Xiaobai is only allowed to drive a MINI to go out ~ driving is a bit unaccustomed." This is a Weibo released by "Guo Meimei Baby" in the early morning of June 2 1. Earlier, according to media reports, Weibo Middle School had released a series of "showing off wealth" content. Young face, fashionable dress, famous bags, famous cars and villas, "Guo Meimei Baby" quickly became the focus of netizens' attention.
Young people, famous cars, luxury houses ... make it difficult for netizens to connect them with charitable organizations like the Red Cross. "People are so promising when they are just 20 years old" and "The Red Cross seems to be really rich", and some netizens have questioned it. In addition, some netizens linked it with Guo Changjiang, vice president of China Red Cross Society. "I suggest to find out what the relationship is.". Although its certification has been cancelled by Sina Weibo, in his personal description, "China Red Cross Commercial General Manager" still stays in a prominent position next to the photo.
On the morning of June 2 1, an uncertified Weibo named "Guo Changjiang RC-" and "Guo Meimei" appeared on Sina Weibo. Weibo, whose three articles were published, attracted many netizens' saliva in less than two hours. Many netizens thought it was Guo Changjiang's Weibo, vice president of China Red Cross Society. Some netizens also said in the message: "Spitting and drowning people everywhere, your daughter is too high-profile."
Guo Changjiang RC- "Quickly deleted the previous three Weibo articles, and released a new message," Is it really that interesting to gossip about other people's lives? Peeping tom can rest. "
affect
June 29, 20 1 1
Tianya delete posts
Maopu deleted posts
Great day, commemorated here. It can be said that the emergence of the "Guo Meimei Incident" is definitely a good thing if it is properly guided: strengthening the public welfare attributes of charitable organizations in the whole society can promote more people to donate charity; The government actively solves the historical problems exposed in the incident and promotes the healthy development of charity.
Vice chairman of the red cross
On the morning of June 22nd, at 20 1 1, the reporter called Guo Changjiang, vice president of China Red Cross Society. When a reporter mentioned the name of "Guo Meimei" in Weibo, Guo Changjiang couldn't help laughing. "She is not my daughter at all, and I have no daughter at all."
Red Cross officials
China Red Cross Foundation issued a statement in official website, responding to Sina Weibo netizen "@ Guo Meimei Baby" showing off his wealth. The following is the full text of the statement: A netizen named "Guo Meimei Baby" claimed to be "the general manager of the business of the Red Cross Society of China" and showed off his luxurious lifestyle on the Internet, which triggered heated discussion and even speculation among netizens. After investigation and verification of the relevant situation, we hereby make the following explanation:
1. There is no "Red Cross Chamber of Commerce" or "General Manager of Commerce" in China Red Cross Society, and there is no such person as Guo Meimei.
Second, in order to maintain the seriousness of the Red Cross logo, China's Red Cross Law, Trademark Law and related laws and regulations strictly restrict the unauthorized use of the "Red Cross" logo and name by third parties. I will reserve the right to further investigate the relevant responsibilities of the relevant parties.
Third, I will always oppose those attempts to speculate on individuals by creating false information, and I hope that all sectors of society will treat such problems with a peaceful attitude and will not be used.
Finally, I would like to thank all sectors of society for their long-term support for the cause of the Red Cross and hope to continue to supervise the work of the Red Cross.
Red Cross Society of China
20 1 1 Jun. 22nd, 2008
Mysteries abound.
"Guo Meimei Incident" is like a suspense TV series, with wonderful plots constantly emerging and many mysteries still to be solved.
Netizens once again made an amazing discovery: there will always be staff members of the Chinese Red Cross who run enterprises and do business. On July 1 day, some netizens broke the news in Weibo: "Zhang, director of the donation box office of the Red Cross Society of China, is not only the deputy director of the Red Expo Warm Fund and the deputy secretary-general of the Red Communication Fund, but also the general manager of a company called Heartbeat Media."
However, some media asked the China Red Cross for verification, but the Red Cross did not respond positively. At the same time, netizens were surprised to find that shortly after this Weibo was published, some web pages related to Zhang were deleted one after another.
On July 2nd, netizen "Zhou Xiaoyun" made another amazing discovery: Wei Ying, the owner of Yitongmingtang (Beijing) Culture Media Co., Ltd., is the Secretary General of the Red Cross Communication Fund, and even opened a company selling gold and silver antiques. Official website, the company also claimed to be the "Executive Unit of China Red Cross Communication Fund" and undertook many activities and ceremonies carried out by the Red Cross.
four
Edit the introduction of this paragraph.
In 2009, Li Changkui, a native of Ying Ge Village, Zu Mao Township, Qiaojia County, Yunnan Province, raped and killed Wang Jiafei, a girl of 18 years old.
victim
Three-year-old brother Wang Jiahong was also killed. 20 1 1 In March, Yunnan Higher People's Court overturned the sentencing of the first instance judgment, and Li Changkui got a reduced sentence. Recently, after the verdict was exposed by the media, it caused widespread doubts. In a survey, nearly 98% netizens thought Li Changkui was "more cruel than Yao Jiaxin", so they called him "Sai Jiaxin". Some legal workers even shouted, "As long as China is punished, Li Changkui should enjoy this treatment." [ 1]
Edit this paragraph and replay a girl who was raped and killed and a child who fell to her death.
Li Changkui is used to Rainbow Garfield. They are all from Ying Ge Village, Zu Mao Township, Qiaojia County, Zhaotong City, Wang Jiafei, aged 19.
The victim's parents
Li Changkui, who is 10 years older than himself, disagreed with his proposal. According to the investigation, on May 14, 2009, workers in Xichang rushed back to their hometown because of a trivial fight between the Li family and the Wang family.
At noon on June 6th, 65438, Li Changkui met his brother at the entrance of the Wangs' house. Li Changkui had a quarrel with Wang Jiafei on the grounds of discord between the two families. In the struggle, he tore his crotch and strangled Wang at the door of Wang's kitchen and raped him.
When Wang Jiafei woke up, he ran to the main room. Li raised his hoe and hit him hard on the head, knocking him to the ground. Then, Li Changkui turned to Wang Jiahong, who was only 3 years old, raised his hands and feet and slammed into the iron gate, causing his death. After committing the crime, Li Changkui found a rope, strangled his younger brother and sister, and fled the scene.
Wang Jiafei and Wang Jiahong were both identified as intracranial injuries with mechanical asphyxia. On May 20th of the same year, Li Changkui surrendered himself to the Chengguan Police Station in Puge County, Sichuan Province.
High-level retrial punishment is postponed
At the end of 2009, Zhaotong City Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court for intentional homicide and rape. At the same time, the Wangs also claimed more than 380,000 yuan.
During the trial, I argued that I didn't take the initiative to come back to avenge Li Jiahe Wang's family chores, but was ordered to go back to my hometown to deal with emotional entanglements, not a premeditated crime.
Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court made a first-instance judgment on June 5438+05 last year: Li Changkui's criminal means were particularly vicious, the circumstances were particularly bad and the consequences were particularly serious. Its crime is extremely serious, which is extremely harmful to society and should be severely punished according to law. Although Li Changkui has turned himself in, it is not enough to reduce his punishment. Li Changkui was convicted of intentional homicide, sentenced to five years in prison, deprived of political rights for life, and committed rape. Decided to execute the penalty and deprive him of political rights for life. Compensation for family losses of 30,000 yuan.
After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, Li Changkui appealed. On March 4th, 20 1 1, Yunnan Higher People's Court held that the facts were clearly ascertained, the conviction was accurate and the trial procedure was legal, but the sentence was too heavy. After committing the crime, Li Changkui surrendered himself to the public security organs, truthfully confessed the facts of the crime, had the plot of surrender, had a good attitude of pleading guilty and repenting, and actively compensated the victims' families for their economic losses. He was sentenced to Li Changkui with two years' probation for intentional homicide and rape. [2]
Edit this paragraph to disagree with the victim's family.
The delay in the final judgment has shocked the families of the victims. "The court evaded the importance and made no mention of Li Changkui's means of killing, plot, consequences and harm to society, only mentioning the plot of his surrender." Wang Jiafei's family said that Li Changkui did not surrender to the public security organs after committing the crime, but fled to Xichang and other places. On the fourth day, when he tried to escape, he was chased around by the public security organs and was cornered before he surrendered. "This kind of surrender is also a passive surrender, which is far from enough for a lighter punishment."
In addition, regarding "positive compensation", family members said that after the incident, Li Changkui's family turned a blind eye to the Wangs, and finally paid 2 1838 yuan, and the rest was delayed. "How can this be called positive compensation?" Subsequently, the family members and more than 200 villagers in the village jointly filed a complaint with the Provincial High Court, demanding that the retrial procedure be initiated and Li Changkui be sentenced to immediate execution.
Public opinion media
Netizen "Grandpa eats peanuts": "For a long time, China has always advocated judicial specialization, and now it is forced by public opinion one after another. Judicial specialization itself needs to convince the public with strict jurisprudence, but this case obviously failed. The court decision in this case is abstract and simple, which is not enough to convince the public. Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court held in the first instance that although Li had surrendered himself, he was not given a lighter punishment according to law, so he was sentenced; The second trial of the Yunnan Provincial High Court held that although Li had committed a heinous crime, he had surrendered himself and actively compensated him, so he was given a lighter punishment. Life is a matter of life, but these two sets of' although ... but' don't tell the truth clearly, so why shouldn't they be lighter? If only the judge who wrote the judgment knows the twists and turns of the case, but is unwilling to explain it to the public, then he has reserved space for rumors. ”[2]
Editing this paragraph, the dispute surrendered and became a gold medal free of charge?
"Yao Jiaxin also has a plot to surrender, and he surrendered on the same day, unlike Li Changkui who surrendered on the fourth day after fleeing. Yao Jiaxin also has the attitude of pleading guilty and repenting, and is willing to actively compensate. To some extent, Li Changkui's frank and active compensation for losses is not as good as Yao Jiaxin's. Yao Jiaxin was executed. Why is Li Changkui not punished? " A netizen said.
"So, is it free as long as there is a surrender plot?" Netizen Weiyang Wolong said, "How can such a heinous guy turn himself in? The Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province also wants to show humanistic care and goodwill to him. Where is the goodwill for ordinary people? "
Ou commented that even if he surrendered voluntarily when there was no way out, it was a surrender. However, it is very common in judicial practice that the circumstances of surrender do not necessarily require a lighter sentence.
The reporter learned that the provisions of China's laws on surrender are relatively simple and vague, with only one sentence: "Those who surrender can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment." On February 22 last year, 65438 the Supreme People's Court issued the Opinions on Several Specific Issues Concerning Handling Surrender and Meritorious Service, which clearly stipulated: "Although there are circumstances of surrender or meritorious service, the circumstances of the crime are particularly bad, and the consequences of the crime are particularly serious. The defendant is subjectively vicious and personally dangerous, or he is prepared to surrender and perform meritorious service in order to escape the law and avoid punishment before committing a crime." Yao Jiaxin was "sentenced" in this way. Therefore, surrender obviously cannot be a "talisman" or "no gold medal" for criminals.
You can't kill people with public anger!
As early as last year, when Yao Jiaxin's case was tried, He Weifang, a legal scholar, published a signed article, "Do you want to treat a person with mass revelry? . He pointed out that the reason why the drug case caused such strong concern and even public outrage was more critical than the drug case itself, including the performance of some media and individual experts, as well as the abnormal behavior of the court of first instance (such as issuing questionnaires to the audience). He reminded public opinion to be calm: "A person can be sentenced to death according to law, but can't we treat our peers in a collective carnival way?"
In the Li Changkui incident, many people said that the different results of the two cases were due to the different concerns of public opinion. Netizen Yang Tao wrote, "The only difference between the two cases may be reflected in the different concerns of public opinion. Yao Jiaxin's case has an agent who is good at using public opinion, and was particularly concerned by public opinion before the trial. The Li case did not attract public attention before the trial.
He said that if Li Changkui, who committed a more serious crime, was pardoned only because of different public concerns, wouldn't it be the sorrow of China's justice? Only by applying a standard to the administration of justice at any time can we be fair and win the trust of the people.
Some netizens said relatively calmly: "We should close the case according to law and not kill a person in a rage."
Kill less and be careful until you don't kill.
Like Yao Jiaxin's case, Li Changkui's case has also triggered a new round of debate about "whether to keep or abolish the death penalty". Kill or not? People have different opinions. A jurist interviewed by a reporter predicted that in about 30 years' time, the punishment in China will be abolished. After the overhaul of criminal law last year and the abolition of 13 penalties, there is a very high-profile view in academic circles: fighting violence with violence is not the concept that modern rule of law should pursue, and penalties will be "gradually abolished" in China based on respect for the right to life. Therefore, killing less and killing carefully is also an important knowledge in the current court trial work.
Some netizens think: "When is revenge? Wouldn't it be better to keep Li Changkui's life and let him atone? " Another netizen thinks: "In today's environment, even if punishment is to be abolished, it should be done from the legislative level, and there can be no case breakthrough." [2]
The progress of editing this paragraph was decided to try again under pressure.
"We insist on one life and two lives!" Yesterday, Wang Jiafei's father, Wang Tingli, told reporters that as early as a month ago, they applied to the provincial procuratorate to start the trial supervision procedure, protested to the court and revoked the final judgment. He also filed a complaint with the Provincial High Court, hoping that the Provincial High Court would start the retrial procedure and change the sentence. "We have submitted applications to the Provincial Political and Legal Committee, even the Central Political and Legal Committee, the Supreme People's Court and the Procuratorate, but there has been no reply so far."
Wang Tingli also said that the judges of Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court and Provincial High Court went to Qiaojia County for trial. The family members of the first instance filed an incidental civil action, participated in the trial and got the verdict. However, "the family members were not informed during the second trial, and we have not been formally given the verdict of the second trial." They didn't know until they went to the detention center to ask and borrowed a verdict from the police.
Subsequently, the reporter called the Provincial High Court, and the relevant personnel of the news center of the hospital said that the Provincial High Court attached great importance to this matter. At present, a special person has been sent to review the case, and the results of the review will be announced to the public. As for whether the retrial procedure will be submitted, it is not convenient to disclose at present. [3][2]
The victim's family asked for a lawyer again.
On July 15, according to the reporter's understanding to the victim's family, the victim's family in Yunnan case has officially entrusted Wang Yong, the plaintiff's attorney in the second instance of Yao Jiaxin case, as its attorney. According to family members, Wang Yong accepted the entrustment of his family to be his attorney, and only charged a symbolic agency fee of 1 yuan. [4] At noon on July 16, Wang Yong, a lawyer of Beijing Zhongqi Law Firm, published a blog post "Li Changkui case enters retrial procedure: Yunnan Higher People's Court made a retrial decision on Li Changkui case, and today delivered a retrial decision to his family".
Justice lawyer publishes blog posts.
At noon today (16), the Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province delivered a retrial decision to the families of the victims in the Li Changkui case, and decided to form a collegial panel for retrial. The case officially began to enter the retrial procedure. The reason for the retrial of Yunnan Higher People's Court is that after the judgment became legally effective, the plaintiffs Wang Tingli and Chen Jinli in the incidental civil action in the original trial refused to accept it and appealed to our court. The court examined the case in time. The People's Procuratorate of Yunnan Province put forward procuratorial suggestions to our hospital during the examination, believing that Li Changkui, the defendant in the original trial, had a lighter sentence and should be retried. The president of our hospital considered it necessary to form a collegiate bench to retry the case after examination, and submitted it to the judicial Committee of our hospital for discussion and decision on 201kloc-0. According to Article 204 (3) and Article 205 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and the provisions of the Supreme People's Court, this case will be retried according to the trial supervision procedure.
This case will be retried by a collegiate panel formed by our court separately.
During the retrial, our court will not stop the execution of the original judgment.
Then, Article 204 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates: "If the complaints of the parties, their agents and close relatives meet one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall retry: ... (3) The original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong in applying the law", and Article 205, paragraph 1, stipulates: "The presidents of people's courts at all levels find that the legally effective judgments or rulings of our court are in fact or
Article 302 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning Implementation stipulates: "After accepting a complaint, the people's court shall make a ruling within three months, but no later than six months. After examination, it is considered that there is one of the circumstances stipulated in Article 204 of the Criminal Procedure Law, and the president shall submit it to the judicial committee for retrial; For a complaint that does not conform to the provisions of Article 204 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the complainant shall be persuaded to withdraw the complaint; Article 304: "If the presidents of the people's courts at all levels find errors in ascertaining facts or applying the law in a legally effective judgment or ruling, and submit them to the judicial committee for discussion and decision for retrial, they shall form a new collegial panel for retrial. "
As can be seen from the above-mentioned legal provisions that determine the basis for retrial, both parties refuse to accept the appeal, and the people's procuratorate puts forward procuratorial suggestions (there is no protest here, and procuratorial suggestions and protests are two concepts). At the same time, the president of the people's court found that there are basically ways to start retrial in law (except for the discovery by the higher court and the protest procedure of the procuratorate).
Therefore, we are full of confidence that this case will be led to right and wrong, and the wrong case will be corrected according to law!
However, although the case has entered the trial supervision procedure, it does not mean that it has won an inevitable victory. We will also put forward our own legal opinions in strict accordance with the law at every step until we win the final victory! ! ! The day when Li Changkui was brought to justice, it was time to return justice and fairness to their true colors!
We firmly believe that the law will prevail! Misjudged cases must be investigated! The people will win! Justice will win!
I hope that the Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province can correct its mistakes, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and safeguard the dignity of the law! ! ! We will not give up safeguarding rights according to law, nor will we give up our efforts.
Wang Yong
20 1 1 Beijing July 16
Subsequently, the reporter telephoned Wang Yong, a lawyer of Beijing Zhongqi Law Firm, and confirmed the matter. [5]
The high court will reopen the case.
Former world champion busking and begging in the street
Zhang Shangwu, the gymnastics champion of the Universiade, committed theft and was released from prison to perform in the street; The General Administration of Sports conducted an investigation into this matter.
Zhang Shangwu, whose height is 1.5 1 m, made 20 "Thomas Swirls" in a row, stood up and clapped his hands, shouting at the onlookers: "Now believe that I am a world champion!"
At 2 o'clock noon yesterday, the gymnastics champion of the 200 1 Beijing Universiade has been begging here for more than half a month at Exit A of Wangfujing Station of Metro1Line.
Yesterday, the relevant staff of Hebei Provincial Sports Bureau said that they had been informed of the matter and were currently investigating. The official also said that the relevant departments of the State Sports General Administration have also begun to investigate the matter.
Used to be the key "seedling" of the national team.
Zhang Shangwu, 27, said that he earned money for his grandfather's performing arts in his hometown of Baoding. "There is no money at home, grandpa has cerebral thrombosis and incontinence." .
1988, five-year-old Zhang Shangwu entered Hebei Baoding Amateur Sports School, and 12 was selected as the national gymnastics team.
At the 200 1 Beijing Universiade, 18-year-old Zhang Shangwu won the gold medal in the rings and won the men's team championship together with Xing Aowei and Yang Wei.
In this regard, gymnastics champion Xing Aowei confirmed in Weibo that Zhang Shangwu's strength and talent were above him at that time.
Zhang Shangwu, who once became the key training target of the national team, broke his left achilles tendon in the subsequent training, quit the national team and returned to Hebei team in 2002.
In 2005, Zhang Shangwu, aged 178, said goodbye to his gymnastics career with tens of thousands of yuan in compensation, old-age insurance and "full of complaints".
"There is no skill except gymnastics."
Zhang Shangwu said that he had no skills except gymnastics, and he had to make a living by busking and begging.
Since April this year, "I went to Shijiazhuang first, and I can earn more than 20 yuan by selling myself and begging every day." He said: "I said I was a world champion, and no one believed me. When I was in Tianjin, I only received seven or eight yuan a day."
More than a month ago, Zhang Shangwu came to Beijing. A backpack with several medals and a photo of winning the gold medal in the gymnastics men's team with teammate Yang Wei at the Beijing Universiade have been crumpled.
"These certificates are useless. Only when you make a Thomas gyro will someone give money. " Zhang Shangwu said that he used to be an artist, begging in Tianqiao, Xidan and Wangfujing, earning 30 to 40 yuan a day, but he was constantly driven away while performing arts.
World champions become "recidivists"
The public security departments in Beijing and Tianjin are very familiar with this world champion.
In July, 2007, Zhang Shangwu was arrested by the police for stealing property worth 10,000 yuan, such as laptops, from Xiannongtan Sports Technical School.
He admitted that he had stolen many times in Fengtai Guang Cai Gymnasium and Xicheng Shichahai Sports School. In April this year, after spending three years 10 months in prison, he was released from prison.
Yesterday, the reporter learned from the Beijing police that in May this year, he was given an administrative warning by the public security department for begging at the gate of the zoo on Metro Line 4, disturbing public order. In June, begging in the form of "handstand" at Xidan Station of Line 4 affected normal traffic, and he was detained for five days for "disturbing public order".
According to relevant personnel, Zhang Shangwu had the experience of bicycle theft, car theft, highway robbery, robbery and pickpocketing in Hexi District, Tianjin, and was dealt with nearly 30 times, especially bicycle theft as many as 15 times.
In this regard, Zhang Shangwu said, "I didn't eat or drink at that time, which was forced by life." .
Zhang Shangwu won the gold medal in men's rings at the 200 1 Beijing Universiade.
Zhang Shangwu won the gold medal in the gymnastics men's team of the Beijing Universiade, and was jailed for theft after retiring; I have been begging in Wangfujing for half a month.
-Tell a story
"I wanted to retire to study, but I was blocked by the provincial team."
The year 2002 may be a turning point in Zhang Shangwu's life.
On June+10 in 5438, Zhang Shangwu, who had just attended the Ghent Gymnastics World Championships, broke his left achilles tendon in a training session and withdrew from the national team due to injury, completely losing the opportunity to participate in the Athens Olympic Games.
"Achilles tendon rupture means the end of gymnasts' sports career," said Zhang Shangwu, who returned to Hebei Gymnastics Team after resting for 10 months. "At that time, I was still the number one star in the team." .
"The coach of the provincial team didn't care about my injury. He didn't let me practice the strong ring, but he practiced the omnipotence. " Zhang Shangwu said that at that time, the coach asked him to practice the action of "standing straight and somersaulting 720 degrees for two weeks". This is a move beyond the difficulty of Group E, and I couldn't succeed even before I was injured.
Therefore, Zhang Shangwu retired on June 5438+00, 2003, hoping that the provincial team would recommend him to study in Hebei Sports School and become a coach after graduation.
"The leader of the provincial team told me that if you want to learn, you have to practice omnipotence first. As for how long I practiced and what I achieved, I didn't mention it. " Zhang Shangwu said that this made him feel chilling, and his relationship with leaders and coaches deteriorated. "Later, when the leaders of the provincial sports bureau asked me for advice on retirement, the head coach said,' There is no me in his team'".
"It's not that I can't bear hardships. It's really that I'm injured and troubled, and the action is too difficult. " Zhang Shangwu has repeatedly explained.
In June 2005, Zhang Shangwu retired from the provincial team with 30,000 yuan compensation and pension insurance. "In my 18 gymnastics career, I got a bonus of 40,000 yuan, most of which was used up by the money I usually spent on food and clothing." Zhang Shangwu said that when he retired, all his savings were only 38,000 yuan.
For this figure, the Hebei Provincial Sports Team does not recognize it. Yesterday, the relevant person in charge of the unit said that Zhang Shangwu had been trained by the state for so many years, and soon proposed to retire after he came back. According to the relevant regulations, he chose to choose his own job and received a resettlement fee of about 60,000 yuan. As for the expenses, generally speaking, any achievements will be paid according to the corresponding standards. "I have seen the notarized written agreement."