Personally, I think this incident is typical, and both sides have complaints. The troublemaker belongs to the plaintiff, and the defendant can be said to be self-defense. After all, everyone's patience is limited, and everyone has the right to defend his dignity. Usually, the masses will sympathize with the defendant's misfortune. First, he didn't take the initiative to publicize it. Second, his behavior belongs to the category of self-defense. Third, he is still young, a young man in his early twenties. Moreover, the focus of the court's trial of this incident is whether the defendant's practice is self-defense or excessive defense. The court's trial must be reasonable, and whether it can convince the public is another matter.
When people are emotional, there will be many excessive behaviors. The defendant lost his life because of the defense. The court is a state organ that pays attention to evidence. According to the monitoring, the plaintiff suppressed the defendant with slight violence at the scene of the incident. However, the defendant's defense was indeed careless, which obviously exceeded the degree of legitimate defense. So, in the end, there is an extreme problem. When insulted by others, defense should also follow the law, and it is not easy to be excessively violent. When the defendant defends himself properly, the most important thing is to tolerate the life safety of others. Even if he is the one who is forced to commit violence, he should do everything in moderation. We can see many details in the surveillance video. Although the plaintiff and the victim started the trouble, the last victim was still a troublemaker, and his life would be expensive. The victim Li Lei was beaten to death by the defendant Wang Lang, which was an excessive defense. Even if he is forced to exercise it, he has touched the bottom line of the law.