Whether it's a debate about whether late justice is justice or insisting that justice must appear in the form of insight, once a criminal case is found guilty, the defendant in the criminal case must face legal punishment, not only because of its long or short sentence, or the inner test of life's possible death, but also because it will become a symbol, a brand will always be deeply embedded in your body and deeply imprinted in your heart. Even your family, your social relations, all aspects of you, and even affect future generations. The result of conviction and sentencing in criminal cases is to deprive a person of his freedom or even his life. As the last line of defense to protect society, criminal trial requires not only respect and observance of the law, but also respect and understanding of those who uphold justice. If you don't respect people, what about a just cause? I have always thought that the law does not need to kill each other, kill each other and be dark. I don't know what this means. Of course, I am also very clear that this ideal is utopia and misjudges the good situation. However, I have always believed that justice still exists and the ranks of justice will continue to grow. Just like the answer given in teacher Liang's book "Will this society be good?" yesterday, this society will be good.
Now we can talk about the book. This book is a book written by Mr. Zhu Mingyong according to his own criminal case experience, with all kinds of hardships, hardships, feelings and sentiments. Among them, there are not only in-depth analysis of case evidence, strategies and skills, but also in-depth thinking of criminal defense. The cases are concise, properly analyzed, with deep feelings and sincere words.
In this book, the author tells how he refused the iron rice bowl on the day of registration. In fact, the result is not important. What matters is the process of thinking and positioning yourself. The author has working experience in the Commission for Discipline Inspection. He didn't complete the enlightenment of the rule of law by passing the judicial examination in graduate school, where he recreated his own definition of freedom. Facing the scene of becoming a prosecutor, he not only remembered the details of his life in the system, but also faced his heart and constantly questioned what he wanted most. The author was glad to find it.
When dealing with criminal defense, we should have a sense of justice and everyone should be treated fairly. We can neither wronged a good man nor connived at a bad man. However, the truth is always the most clear to the parties. What we can do is to identify legal facts without reasonable doubt when the evidence is confirmed. However, there will always be some deviations, but for individuals, these deviations are a great thing. As criminal workers, their inner confirmation and the search for the truth are the only way to obtain justice.
When fighting swords in Jianghu, there must be peerless cheats. The seriousness of the author and the accumulation of professional knowledge are the most basic, and the accumulation of this kind of exercise is determined by the attitude of specialization. It is more important to master and understand other professional knowledge, such as the analysis of medical diagnosis, the exploration of polygraph test, and the mastery of footprint recognition. If you want to learn poetry, you must practice hard outdoors and strive for money every day in order to gain a foothold in the rivers and lakes. The identification of the exclusion of illegal evidence, the analysis of causality and the refutation of expert opinions in the criminal field are all important and complicated issues in the current criminal field. We have a new understanding of these issues through reading. I deeply feel that the road of criminal defense has a long way to go, and it must be guided by firm beliefs, and there must be a fire in my heart to light up the road of hope.
Different fields are isolated in a smaller field of vision. The so-called interlacing is like a mountain, but it must be connected in a larger field of vision. For example, in the Zhou case, the defendant put forward the pressure cooker theory, the yield point theory, and even used the mathematical method of probability theory to demonstrate the similar probability in the transcript, thus determining the conclusion of not extorting a confession by torture. We can't help but feel that the relationship between disciplines must be carefully studied, and our horizons must be broadened. We should not only connect, but also extract the essence.
As a member of the same legal system, I finally use a paragraph in the book to * * * encourage:
In this field:
We should be kind, because the benevolent has no worries;
We should have the heart of wisdom, because the wise have no doubts;
We will uphold the heart of the brave, because the brave are fearless.