How to enter the mailbox of Dean the Supreme People's Court?

Dear Dean of Supreme Law Week;

The Supreme Court of People's Republic of China (PRC) should be recognized by the people of the whole country, the most authoritative and just, and the core of maintaining fairness and justice. It should firmly hold the heavy power of law and the heavy weapon of the state, take charge of life and death, rectify corruption and rehabilitate unjust, false and wrong cases. This is the foundation of governing the country and safeguarding the country and benefiting the people.

Apply for retrial;

Applicant; Zhang Xiping, male, Han nationality, farmer, freelancer, Beijing decoration carpenter, lives in Dongruitun Village, Gao Chuan Township, Cang County, Cangzhou City, Hebei Province 125. Tel:181013169,1861641664.

Respondent; Cangxian Court lodged a complaint against caseNo. 2004/2005. 200 1 warehouse in Zi Chu185; The evidence of conviction is untrue, and there are serious contradictions between the evidences. The source of the evidence is unknown, which is fraud, false accusation and frame-up.

Requested item;

Request the Supreme Court to file a case for review of 200 1 Cang Chu ZiNo.. 185 In accordance with the provisions of Article 253 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the wrongs were rehabilitated and Zhang Xiping's innocence was changed.

Cause of action; 200 1 Cang 1 18 criminal incidental civil affairs. In this case, one explanation of Cangxian Public Security Bureau No.00085 and one investigation report of Cangxian Public Security Bureau No.000036No. 5438+0 on March 8, 2006 and two copies can prove that the judgment of Cangxian Court is wrong.

200 1 Cangxing Zi ChuNo. 1 12 possession of firearms. 200 1 Cang rape case 185. Possession of a gun for acquittal. These three cases are related.

Facts and reasons;

200 1 Cang Fa Zi Chu 185. The evidence of conviction is untrue, and there are serious contradictions between the evidences. The evidence was falsely accused and framed. The source of the evidence is unknown. The police didn't extract it, but I provided evidence. The DNA public property identification evidence of Ministry of Public Security 200 1 is Zheng Liyan himself. On April 25th, 20001year, eight months after she was raped, she sent a piece of cloth to Cangxian Public Security Bureau to wipe her penis. The entrustment time sent by Cangxian Public Security Bureau to the Ministry of Public Security was May 22, 200 1 year, and the Ministry of Public Security appraised it with the word 22 10. These evidences were planned by Li Yutang, director of criminal investigation of Cangxian Public Security Bureau, and Li Xuewen, president of Cangxian Criminal Court. In the caseNo. 1 Cang Fa Zi Chu Di 185, Cangxian court wiped the penis according to the cloth sent by Cangxian Public Security Bureau on April 25, 2006, but there was no leucorrhea, no trauma and no scratches. Rape is an explosive crime. Zhang Xiping found Pei Lifa, a doctor of the Ministry of Public Security, and the diagnosis of Pei Lifa did not say it was the cloth. In August of the lunar calendar in 2000, with an interval of 8 months, Zhang Xiping committed rape. How to be convicted and sentenced? Deceiving material evidence, falsely accusing and framing. Cangxian county court exercised the right of extra-justice, and court officials at all levels sheltered each other, stuck to the end and made no mistakes. This is the principle of the local court.

Service request; I request President Zhou of the Supreme Court to take the lead, give me justice according to law, return my innocence, and change my innocence in accordance with the basic principles of the people's court based on facts and taking the law as the criterion, and restore the great shame imposed on me in the past 20 years, and request the Supreme Court to retry according to the provisions of Article 253 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).

State the facts;

First, Hebei Higher People's Court No.47, 2007 retrial decision.

In our opinion, the criminal judgmentNo. 1 Cang 1 12 was wrongly applied, and the criminal judgment No.200 1 CangNo. 185 was improper. According to the third paragraph of article 204 and the second paragraph of article 205 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Supreme People's Court's "On the Implementation of People's Republic of China (PRC)"

The Cangxian People's Court was instructed to form a collegiate bench to retry the case. Legal document dated 2007 1 1 26th.

II. Criminal Ruling No.6 of Cangzhou Intermediate People's Court in 2008, legal document, August 2008 10.

Third, the Higher People's Court of Hebei Province rejected the notice of appeal, and on June 17, 2009, it made the legal document of Case No.243 in 2008. Wang Mingchuan, the competent judge of the Provincial High Court, transferred him to the Provincial High Court and gave him a punishment before dismissal.

Four. AnnouncementNo. 1 17 of the Supreme Court of People's Republic of China (PRC), the printing date of legal documents is 202 1 September13rd. The Supreme Court transferred the volume to Beijing. Zhang, the president of Cangxian County Court, was sent to the Supreme Court and rejected. Cangxian court asked me for peace talks, but I didn't agree.

Verb (short for verb) request.

Request to revoke the original ruling, reopen the case, and change the sentence according to law, declare innocence, and return Zhang Xiping to innocence.

I am here to convey

Supreme court;

Complainant; Zhang Xiping

2021165438+1October 25th