CCTV News: The defendants in the original trial all claimed that there was no contradiction with Tang, and they could not explain why they were falsely accused. So, is it possible for Tang to falsely accuse?
In this review, the collegial panel verified that the investigation organ had conducted a mental appraisal of the victim Tang at that time, and the conclusion was that he was mentally normal. At the time of reporting, Tang Cai 14 years old. Now, ten years have passed. What did Tang think of the accusations when he grew up? The collegial panel found Tang to investigate and verify. After obtaining Tang's consent, our reporter interviewed Tang, the most critical party in this case, by telephone.
Reporter: Is this Tang?
Don: Yes.
Reporter: I am a CCTV reporter. I have some questions to check with you.
Don: OK.
Reporter: If you have any questions that violate your privacy or don't want to answer, you can tell me directly, ok?
Don: Well, ok.
Tang told reporters in an interview that on June 3, 2008, 10, she refused to go home with her mother Wan, mainly because she was afraid.
Don: I just feel scared.
Reporter: What are you mainly afraid of?
Don: I'm afraid she'll take me back, and I'm afraid she'll hit me.
Reporter: Why are you so afraid to go home?
Don: As she said, you can't get out when you go back. You may have to bear all kinds of unbearable things every day when you go back.
Reporter: What is the unbearable thing you said?
Don: It's just rape and gang rape.
Regarding these experiences in childhood, Tang said that she has been forcing herself to forget, but until now, she still remembers the names of all those who sexually assaulted her.
Reporter: You said that your father raped you many times when you were a child. Is it true?/You don't say.
Don: It's true.
Reporter: What did you think as an adult?
Don: After all, animals are worse than animals!
Reporter: Because you reported their crimes, 1 1 people were sentenced to jail. Do you think this 1 1 person has been wronged?
Don: No.
Reporter: No?
Don: No, I dare to take legal responsibility for my words.
Reporter: They are also complaining about their innocence everywhere. Do you know this?
Don: This is my mother and my parents. How can I wronged them for what they didn't do? I want to ask, is there such a person in the world? If I'm not the victim, why should I wronged them? Is it good for me that I wronged them? What happened to me, what happened to me, this is my wound. Why did I falsely accuse them?
Sun Guanyu, the presiding judge of the collegiate bench: From the time Tang 14 reported the case to this review, he insisted that there was no false accusation against the defendant, and the facts stated were basically the same. We have not found the motive of Tang falsely accusing and framing the defendant, and the existing evidence proves that Tang did not falsely accuse and frame the defendant.
related news
The Heilongjiang Provincial High Court rejected the complaints of Tang Jihai and others.
Xinhua News Agency, Harbin, July 27th-After more than five months of investigation and review, the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province publicly announced on the 27th that it rejected the appeals of the defendants Tang Jihai and Wan et al. in the original trial of the Tang case.
It is understood that the defendants Tang Jihai, Liu, Chen Chunfu and Yu in the original trial of the "Tang case" filed complaints with the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province on the grounds of being framed and extorting confessions by torture, requesting retrial and acquittal. 2065438+On February 8, 2008, the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province decided to file a case and form a collegial panel for examination according to law.
When the court checked the facts and evidence of the case with the defendant in the original trial 1 1, Wan, the defendant in the original trial, filed a written complaint and Ji, Liang Liquan,,, filed an oral complaint.
Previously, Liu Changhai, another defendant in the original trial, filed a complaint with the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province, which was rejected on 20 14. Liu Changhai continued to file a complaint with the People's Procuratorate of Heilongjiang Province, which was rejected on 20 16; Liu Changhai appealed to the Supreme People's Procuratorate again, and 20 17 was rejected.
According to the notification of the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province, the court investigated and verified the complainant's complaint, the opinions of Tang Jihai's attorney, the evidence materials submitted, the evidence applied for investigation and verification, and the issues concerned by the Internet one by one, and carefully examined the facts and evidence of the whole case. After discussion by the judicial Committee of our hospital, the above review conclusion was reached.
The Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province held that the plaintiff's criminal facts were clear, the evidence was true and sufficient, the conviction was accurate, the sentencing was appropriate and the trial procedure was legal. The complainant raped, forced prostitution and slept with underage girls respectively, and the circumstances were bad and the consequences were serious. The original judgment convicted the complainant according to law, and the penalty imposed was not improper. None of the complainant's complaints can be established, and the original judgment does not exist in the circumstances that should be retried as stipulated in Article 242nd of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), so it is rejected.
The Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province has read the notice of rejection to the complainant in accordance with the law and served it in court, detailing the reasons for rejection.