First of all, let me explain to you that the original intention of setting up a master of law is to cultivate research-oriented talents in professional law (as a discipline), and those who study law at the undergraduate level can only apply for law majors. The original intention of setting up a master of law is to train legal affairs talents. Undergraduate students majoring in non-law can apply for the exam because they have the foundation of other disciplines. To answer your question: 1, the master of law is naturally more difficult than the master of law. The topic is generally research-oriented (generally the school is purely written and has no choice). Master of law is a national unified examination, unified teaching materials and fair. Moreover, non-law majors applied for the exam, so everyone stood at the same starting point. 2. Master of Laws is usually paid by oneself, but there are also some schools that are not very good, public. Master of law is now generally self-funded. So there is no difference in price. Master of Laws is not only for students majoring in law, but also for anyone who studies law. Not necessarily this year. But with a master's degree in law, people majoring in law can't take the exam. 4. In terms of employment, each has its own emphasis. Law focuses on research, and law focuses on practice (such as lawyers). However, some units, such as some positions in the civil service, will restrict the acceptance of only people majoring in law. After all, I have received a systematic legal education. To sum up, LLM is hard to find a good job. It's better to get a master's degree in law than to find a job (but it's also good to pass the judicial examination or graduate from a prestigious school to find a job). There is an article about the difference between the two, for reference only: the difference between master of law and master of law is as follows: 1. The training objectives are different: the professional degrees of master of law and master of law are at the same level, and each has its own emphasis. The former is an applied and compound senior legal talent, while the latter is an academic and professional senior legal talent. In some western countries where the rule of law is relatively sound, their legal education is after the university, such as the United States and other JD. In the long run, with the development of law education, the number of law undergraduates will gradually decrease, and the master of law will eventually merge with the master of law. Teaching and scientific research talents should be trained mainly through doctor of law education. As a bridge between the preceding and the following, the professional degree of Master of Laws will provide talents for legal practice departments on the one hand, and a broad source of students for doctor of law education on the other. Second, the enrollment conditions are different: the master of law requires non-law graduates, but the master of law has no such restrictions. That is, 13 the law majors that are not allowed to apply for master of law are: law, economic law, international law, international economic law, labor reform law, commercial law, notarization, legal affairs, administrative law, lawyers, foreign-related economy and law, intellectual property law and criminal law. Regarding whether or not to admit schools with the same academic qualifications, some online statements that LLM students do not admit the same academic qualifications are wrong. Third, the way of enrollment proposition, the difficulty of examination questions and the difficulty of examination are different: both the master of law and the postgraduate examination of master of law take the national unified examination, but the master of law major is the national joint examination (unified proposition and unified marking), and the master of law is a separate proposition for colleges and universities with enrollment qualifications. It is obvious to all that the examination difficulty of the master of laws course. LLM professional course examination is a national joint examination subject, which has a unified outline and forms a standardized review textbook with limited difficulty. LLM candidates have not studied law before the exam and stand on the same starting line. Because many candidates don't understand, as a new thing, the current admission score is relatively low and they can be admitted to the national line. There is little difference between the admission scores of prestigious schools and the national line, and the admission ratio is high, and the pressure of admission competition is small. However, LLM candidates are mostly law majors, and the competition pressure is great. The admission rate of famous schools is as high as 1/20-50. LLM's pre-test training is mature, and candidates can greatly improve their competitiveness by participating in a good training. The pass rate of candidates participating in systematic training is as high as over 50%, and some of them reach 70-80%. However, with more and more people with lofty ideals who are not majoring in law joining the legal profession, it is more and more difficult to take the postgraduate entrance examination for master of law! Fourth, the education mode is different: LLM has a fixed tutor when entering school, and the professional division is detailed. There is only one direction in the general research field, and the research has developed in depth. Master of law, regardless of major, focuses on studying current laws and regulations and pays attention to practical application after enrollment. After enrollment, only tutors are set up, and each tutor takes more students. For illegal students, it is not conducive to their own development if they choose a fine professional direction from the beginning of studying law, so the difference between the two educational methods depends on the starting point and background of the candidates, not the main difference. References:
/jinian 040 1/blog/item/a02e 265887 cc 282 c 2834 f08a . html