Ankang professional criminal litigation lawyer consultation

Whistling to tease a woman caused a criminal case, and a man in Ankang died after being beaten for treatment. The view is that before the incident, Zhang whistled and teased Zhang, but Zhang ignored it and drove away with his friends. Who knows, when I met someone at the intersection, I whistled and booed with Yang, and Liu, who was in the same car with Zhang, couldn't bear it and insulted him. If this is the end of the matter, legally, neither side will be found to be illegal.

And Yang teased Zhang with whistles. From their subjective point of view, this is of course hooliganism, in order to seek some kind of spiritual stimulation, but after all, it has not caused great harm. If Zhang calls the police, others may just accept criticism and education and will not pursue other legal responsibilities.

Of course, it must be pointed out that the actions of Chen Mou and others may be identified as sexual harassment in civil, and they need to bear civil tort liability. But things didn't end with Liu's counterattack. Instead, it aroused the "fighting spirit" of Chen Mou and others. They started driving to catch up and repeatedly intercepted the vehicles driven by Zhang, eventually forcing Zhang to stop at a certain section.

Since then, people forced Zhang and others to get off the bus, and there was a dispute between the two sides. Yang then punched Zhang's face, causing the two sides to fight each other. Chen Mou suffered a head injury and died after treatment.

As a result, Chen Mou and others' provocative behaviors escalated step by step, from whistling and teasing at the beginning to chasing, intercepting vehicles and hitting people by car later. The incident was triggered by Zhang's provocative behavior, and then he chased and intercepted Zhang's vehicle by car. This kind of behavior is very harmful, and he is suspected of dangerous driving and provocation. However, due to the heavier sentencing of the crime of picking quarrels and stirring up trouble, it should be punished according to the principle of dealing with imaginative joinder of crimes.

Why didn't Zhang and others take criminal compulsory measures for the crime of intentional homicide or negligent death? Generally speaking, Zhang and others have no intention to kill subjectively because they were teased, chased and intercepted. So the suspicion of intentional homicide can almost be ruled out. As for the crime of intentional injury and the crime of negligent death, we need to restore the situation at the time of the incident and comprehensively consider the location, intensity and frequency of attacks in Chen Mou before we can draw a correct conclusion.