The judge forbade the lawyer to speak.

Subjectivity of law: shouldn't judges interrupt lawyers at will? "Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Effectively Protecting Lawyers' Litigation Rights according to Law" The judge shall not interrupt the lawyer's speech at will. The Supreme People's Court's "Provisions on Effectively Protecting Lawyers' Litigation Rights according to Law" protects lawyers' rights to debate and defend according to law. During the trial, the judge should reasonably allocate the time for questioning, cross-examination, statement, debate and defense of all parties to the litigation, and fully listen to the opinions of lawyers. Unless the lawyer's speech is too repetitive, irrelevant to the case or related issues have been agreed before the trial, the lawyer's speech should not be interrupted. Protect lawyers' right to apply for the exclusion of illegal evidence according to law. If a lawyer applies for excluding illegal evidence and provides relevant clues or materials, and the judge has doubts about the legality of evidence collection after examination, he shall convene a pre-trial meeting or conduct a court investigation. After examination, it is confirmed that there is illegal evidence collection as stipulated by law, and relevant evidence shall be excluded. Protect lawyers' right to apply for evidence according to law. If a lawyer is unable to collect evidence by himself due to objective reasons, he may apply in writing to the people's court for obtaining evidence according to law. If the lawyer's application for obtaining evidence meets the statutory requirements, the judge shall allow it. Protect the personal safety of lawyers according to law. In the process of hearing a case, if the contradictions between the parties intensify and may endanger the personal safety of lawyers, necessary measures should be taken in time. Judges should promptly stop beating, threatening, insulting or slandering lawyers in court and deal with them according to law.