1. Why hi
1. Why high bounties cannot be returned ?
1. Rewards are gifts. The rewarder and the anchor form a donation contract relationship. The donor donates his property to the recipient for free. The recipient (i.e. the anchor) expresses his acceptance of the gift by opening the reward channel. The rewarder clicks "Reward" and the gift is given. The contract is formed.
2. Once the donated property is delivered, it means the transfer of property rights, and the donor cannot revoke the donation. Except under certain circumstances, if the reward itself is invalid or pending, the reward property may be requested to be returned.
3. Legal basis: Article 658 of the "Code of the People's Republic of China" stipulates that the donor can revoke the donation before the right to donate the property is transferred. However, if the application has been completed, it will generally not be returned except under special circumstances.
From the above three points, we can see that the top guy on the list’s 200,000 reward is a legitimate gifting behavior among the anchors, and he has full capacity for civil conduct, and it is also clear that he No matter what he does, unless he has real evidence to prove that the female anchor has induced behavior, it will be difficult to return it.
2. Under what circumstances can I return or cancel a gift?
Scenario 1: The network owner clearly knows that the bounty consumer has no right to dispose of it and it obviously exceeds daily needs. This is mainly a reward for minors (persons under 8 years old without capacity for civil conduct or persons over 8 years old but under 18 years old with limited capacity for civil conduct). Guardians can ask them to return the money; as for rewards for adults, , it is very difficult to prove that the owner knows that the consumer has a spouse, and the spouse does not agree to the reward, and the reward amount obviously exceeds daily needs, and requires the consumer to return it. Therefore, it is relatively difficult for the big names on the list to reverse the verdict through this article.
Scenario 2: Live broadcast rewards that violate public order and good customs are invalid. If online anchors and users engage in pornographic, violent and relationship-based reward behaviors that violate public order and good customs, the spouses can collect relevant evidence and sue to protect their rights. For example, the behavior of rewarding online pornographic anchors on some platforms is not invalid and involves illegal industries.
Scenario 3: Conditional reward. This nature should be regarded as a conditional gift and should be handled with reference to whether the gift is valid. This is the case if the rewarder and the anchor have a private agreement.
Scenario 4: Watch the live broadcast online and give gifts offline. This situation does not belong to consumption, but to gift-giving. If it is a gift given during an offline date with the host, the tipper can claim it back.
Scenario 5: If the party concerned is a person without capacity for civil conduct, the high-amount reward behavior is an invalid civil legal act, and refund can be requested.
I would like to add here that many online beauty anchors offer high rewards in an irregular manner, and they often lure them by talking about offline love and making friends, but it is difficult to prove it. I hope that those single young people or people with ulterior motives will not take chances and end up stealing the chicken but losing the rice.
Supplementary information:
Standard classification of civil conduct capacity:
1. Persons with full capacity for civil conduct:
(1) Over the age of Adults who are 18 years old;
(2) Minors who are 16 years of age or older and rely on their own labor income as their main source of living are regarded as persons with full capacity for civil conduct.
2. Persons with limited capacity for civil conduct:
(1) Minors over eight years old;
(2) Adults who cannot fully recognize their own behavior people.
3. Persons without capacity for civil conduct:
(1) Minors under eight years old;
(2) Adults who cannot identify their own behavior .