Excellent Composition Materials for College Entrance Examination in 22
This caution is undoubtedly necessary when distinguishing whether the specific behavior of slapping the teacher constitutes a public security case or a criminal case. However, the behavior of slapping teachers, regardless of the nature of the case, should be resolutely condemned and severely punished, otherwise it will not be enough to safeguard teachers' rights, ensure teachers' safety and establish teachers' dignity. The dignity and decency of teachers is not only the dignity and decency of teachers, but also the dignity and decency of the whole society.
From this point of view, it is even more necessary to distinguish right from wrong in the road of slapping teachers in 2 years. After all, the dignity and decency of teachers, although representing the dignity and decency of the whole society, should also contain the dignity and decency value of social justice and righteousness, rather than relying on unreasonable coercion and force to maintain face, let alone the jungle dignity of whoever has a big fist. When I was a child, you were mean to me, and when I grew up, I slapped you in the face. This kind of expansion between teachers and students based on each other's muscle strength will eventually ruin the public order and good customs of the whole society and cause trouble to the society.
Therefore, the actor who slapped the teacher "hasn't contacted more than a dozen classmates for more than ten years and is willing to testify for him", which proves that the actor who slapped the teacher "beat him in class" is not the crux of the problem. Is it true that the perpetrator who slapped the teacher was beaten by the teacher 2 years ago, which constitutes a reasonable excuse for the perpetrator to commit violence again 2 years later? If this is the case, then according to each student's personal subjective feelings, any critical remarks made by the teacher may lead to physical or verbal violence against the teacher by the students 2 years later. In other words, even if the teacher's behavior was really unreasonable, irregular or even illegal 2 years ago, it cannot be the reason for students to use violence against teachers 2 years later.
Of course, on the other hand, it is unreasonable, irregular and illegal for students to commit violence against teachers who have caused their own physical and mental injuries 2 years later, which does not mean that teachers' injuries to students 2 years ago are reasonable, compliant and legal. On the contrary, the phenomenon of "slapping the teacher on the road after 2 years" is not only a "revenge" for the teacher, but also a "revenge" for the phenomenon of educating students with language or "body" that still exists in schools today. "
The phenomenon of" warning "to students' education, in a sense, is to" remind "schools and their teachers to respect students' self-esteem and protect their special rights as minors in education.
If the cause of the above-mentioned "blocking the road and slapping the teacher in the face 2 years later" is what the teacher did 2 years ago, then the teacher's behavior will undoubtedly have a great and long-term impact on the students' health, especially their psychology. In some cases, even if the teacher's behavior has obviously violated the laws and regulations such as the Law on the Protection of Minors and the Law on Teachers, when the students grow up and realize the nature of this kind of injury, the physical injury is often not too heavy, and the legal prosecution period has already passed within the range that the minors can bear. But in fact, the private remedy of "slapping the teacher in the face after 2 years" is not a tampering with the prosecution period, but an inheritance of the teacher's physical or verbal violence education behavior.
It is in this sense that while resolutely condemning the behavior of "slapping the teacher in the face after 2 years", it is also necessary to educate the physical or verbal violence in school education, especially in primary and secondary schools, and condemn the behavior of students. In school education, physical or verbal violence committed by teachers in the name of "being good for you" and "being responsible for you" will not be remembered by students as an individual behavior in many cases, but will be passed down as a model. Therefore, should we also review and standardize teachers' educational behavior when reporting to the school for teachers who have been slapped?
Excellent composition materials for the 22 college entrance examination Part II
Bullies that were looked down upon by teachers 2 years ago, will you fight back 2 years later? Recently, the net revealed that Chang, a 33-year-old man from Luanchuan County, Luoyang City, Henan Province, stopped his junior high school teacher on the road and smoked his mouth, and sent a video to show off, claiming that because he had no money and no right at home that year, he was bullied and trampled on his dignity by his teacher at will, and his mind was hurt for life. On December 18, Luanchuan County officially confirmed the incident and said that the police had filed a case.
As the saying goes, it is never too late for a gentleman to take revenge. However, it is hard to say that the practice of stopping and slapping the teacher in the street 2 years later is done by a gentleman and is suspected of breaking the law. Whether the man's statement is true, whether there are exaggerations and misunderstandings, etc., it is not yet possible to draw conclusions. To say the least, even if what the man said is basically true, his extreme approach is not appropriate.
Twenty years ago, it was against professional ethics for a teacher to bully and hurt a poor student who had no money or power. But after 2 years, it is even more inappropriate for a grown-up student to retaliate against his teacher in the same way. From a shallow level, this is the reality of fighting violence with violence and venting anger in the name of "revenge"; From a deeper perspective, this is tantamount to bullying and mutual harm between the weak, which only increases the anger and does not help. More importantly, retaliating against the teacher in such an ugly way not only fails to find back the lost dignity, but also exposes his inner narrowness, emptiness and lack of self-confidence.
It is shocking that the man's revenge on his teacher has won the understanding and affirmation of many netizens, and some even think that the teacher "should play" and the students "play well". Many netizens also appeared to say that they had experienced the bitter history of teachers' beatings and humiliation. In sharp contrast to this, after seeing this news, many teachers became cold-hearted and even had the idea of fleeing from the podium.
Sometimes, the extreme behavior of individuals is not terrible. What is terrible is that many netizens echo it unprincipled and irrationally, which is unfair to teachers and will also bring harm to education.
At present, education can't lose the concept of punishment. Punishment is not equal to corporal punishment, and it has become a * * * * in the industry. However, there are two extremes in its realization: on the one hand, teachers are afraid, unwilling and unwilling to take care of problem students, which leads to the lack of educational punishment function; On the other hand, some teachers still have problems such as corporal punishment and insulting students, which are criticized by the society. Lack of normal discipline and improper corporal punishment and abuse are the problems existing in education in student management. In this case, we should be more alert to the extreme practice of teachers slapping on the face when they see things differently and the online public opinion caused by it.
In a society ruled by law, the "revenge of a gentleman" should take proper and legal means, instead of publicly beating and insulting others. Even if you are really hurt, it should not be the reason to hurt others after 2 years. When a grown-up teenager gets in the way and slaps a teacher, even if he has more wealth and status, his sense of dignity will not exceed that of 2 years ago. (Chen Guangjiang)
Excellent composition materials for the 22 college entrance examination III
Recently, it was revealed that Chang, a 33-year-old man from Luanchuan County, Luoyang City, Henan Province, was stopped by his teacher in a junior high school and sent a video to show off, saying that he was bullied by his teacher because he had no money and no potential. December 18th. Luanchuan county officials confirmed the matter to the media, and said that the police had filed a case and would impose administrative detention on Chang.
The video was shot in June this year. Although it only lasted for more than 1 minute, according to the memory of the teacher who was beaten, the students scolded themselves for more than 2 minutes. Beating a teacher 2 years ago in the street and recording a video, and then uploading it online to show off, the final result is: turning yourself in to the police, and then triggering collective memories, recalling how the teacher physically punished himself in those years.
I have to say that the development logic of the whole thing seems a little breathless. Why a policeman handling a case, which is obviously right or wrong, will also lead to such a big discussion. The reason behind this lies in human memory and the plasticity of memory itself.
Twenty years ago, in the 199s, it was very common for teachers to punish students in counties, towns and primary and secondary schools. For example, when I was in primary school in 1992, my parents said to my teacher, "You can beat me or scold me". At that time, the authority of teachers could not be challenged, and teachers' corporal punishment of students was recognized by school leaders and parents to some extent. As long as you don't make mistakes, even if parents know, they generally don't blame the teacher.
When corporal punishment becomes a social norm, students' physical and mental conditions are easily overlooked. In fact, I'm afraid it's impossible to count how many students were physically injured and psychologically destroyed twenty or thirty years ago. On the Weibo, thousands of people posted scenes of themselves being physically punished by teachers. Boys had their eyelids cut off, girls had their hair pulled, their fists and feet were punched, and sticks and mops went into battle together ... For a time, this information made us feel that these teachers were unforgivable.
It is not uncommon for students to retaliate against their teachers. Some students have been beating their teachers since graduation, and some students feel that they can't beat their teachers, so they deflate the tires of their bicycles to get rid of them. Revenge means can be described as varied, because there was no selfie and no short video in those days, so it didn't cause such a hot discussion today. It can be seen that in the 199s or even earlier, corporal punishment of students was definitely not news, and teachers' deviant behavior towards students was also very common.
Time flies and the stars have changed. Today, 2 years later, the concept of education has undergone a major change. Today, as an only child in the 198s, another generation of only children has been born. As an only child, the "421" family model makes the children after and 1 extremely expensive. Not to mention that school teachers beat children, even parents themselves are reluctant to beat children. Urbanization, declining birthrate, rapid economic growth, and educational concepts ranging from corporal punishment and intimidation to "positive discipline" have made it increasingly unacceptable for teachers to hit people.
More importantly, the post-8s generation has become the backbone of society. They entered the city from the countryside and became white-collar workers in the city from farmers' sons. These changes prompted them to reflect on the past education methods and enabled them to make their own voices in the public opinion field.
Chang, a 33-year-old, beat his teacher 2 years later. Everyone with insight knows that this is wrong, and he will never follow suit. But emotionally speaking, many post-7 s and post-8 s will tend to support Chang. This phenomenon can really show that it is not that the teachers were poor 2 years ago, but that after 2 years, the educational concept of the whole society has changed greatly, so that today's mainstream social groups will unconsciously apply today's educational standards to "recall" and "judge" the educational methods of that year. "
"The educational method of' recalling that year' is an educational method of' recalling that year'."
the educational method of "recalling the past" is an educational method of "recalling the past".
Are they wrong about the post-7s and post-8s generation? It seems not. Were the teachers 2 years ago wrong? I don't think so. After all, when we judge people decades ago and evaluate past actions, we need to understand the specific background of that era, rather than simply applying today's standards.