On the morning of April 6th, the lawyer representing Su Xiangmao's family confirmed the verdict of the first instance of the civil case to the Du Nan reporter, but said it was not convenient to discuss the details of the case. According to Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court, Su Xiangmao and XinXin Zhai met on March 30th, 20th17, registered their marriage on June 7th, 20th17, and divorced on July 8th of the same year, which is a "flash marriage". On September 7 of that year, Su Xiangmao jumped to his death. The court held that it was illegal for Su Xiangmao to give XinXin Zhai high amounts of property before and after marriage to maintain their relationship, and XinXin Zhai coerced Su Xiangmao to obtain high compensation during and after the divorce, which was one of the reasons for Su Xiangmao's suicide. Therefore, there are two stipulations in the divorce agreement signed by the two men in July 17, namely, "After the divorce, the man unconditionally cooperates with the woman to go through the formalities of transferring the ownership of the house to the woman in Sanya, Hainan. If the man does not cooperate, he will compensate the woman for a penalty of 3 million yuan. ""The man voluntarily compensates the woman in one lump sum10 million in cash ". Accordingly, XinXin Zhai needs to return Su Xiangmao's family a large amount of cash, including a Tesla car worth about 6.5438+0.08 million yuan and Cartier diamond rings and necklaces worth about 3.65438+0.00 million yuan, equivalent to about 6.5438+0.00 million yuan. The court also decided to revoke XinXin Zhai's personal ownership of two properties in Hainan and Beijing.
On April 6th, Su Xiangmao's family told Du Nan that they "thanked the court for seeking truth from facts". The court found Zhai's behavior to be "coercion", but the judgment did not elaborate, so Zhai's family will publish the details of how to "coerce" on the Internet. In addition to civil cases, they also insisted on investigating XinXin Zhai's criminal responsibility. Up to now, relevant criminal cases are under review by the procuratorate and no conclusion has been reached. On the morning of the same day, XinXin Zhai's attorney Han Dongping replied to Du Nan through his law firm, saying that it was not convenient to make any response to the case.