The defense of innocence should follow the following principles: 1. Be particularly familiar with the case. Familiarity with the case requires lawyers to be particularly familiar with and master the whole case, and to be familiar with the occurrence, development and results of the case. Familiar with the facts and circumstances of the defendant's innocence. Only on the basis of being familiar with the case, can we further study and analyze the case in combination with jurisprudence and law and decide whether to defend the defendant's innocence. If you decide to defend the defendant's innocence, you should further analyze how to defend him. 2. Sufficient evidence of innocence means that the lawyer provided sufficient evidence for the defendant's innocence. It's not easy not to plead guilty. Only when the evidence is sufficient can the defense be guaranteed, the facts and reasons of the prosecution can be fundamentally denied, and the innocent opinion of the defense lawyer can be adopted by the judge. 3. Be careful when making decisions. Lawyers should be especially careful when deciding to defend the defendant. 4. Pay attention to communication, avoid risks and pay attention to communication. Lawyers are required to pay attention to communication with courts, public security organs and procuratorial organs when deciding to defend the defendant's innocence.
Legal objectivity:
Article 55 of the Criminal Procedure Law emphasizes evidence and investigation, and does not believe in confession. In sentencing all cases, we should attach importance to evidence, investigation and study, and don't trust confessions. If only the defendant confesses and there is no other evidence, the defendant cannot be found guilty and punished; If there is no confession from the defendant and the evidence is true and sufficient, the defendant may be found guilty and punished. If the evidence is true and sufficient, the following conditions shall be met: (1) The facts of conviction and sentencing are proved by evidence; (2) The evidence on which the final decision is based has been verified through legal procedures; (3) According to the evidence of the whole case, the ascertained facts have been beyond reasonable doubt.