1, the crime of hit-and-run can be sentenced to 3 to 7 years. After the first traffic accident, the crime did not take corresponding measures, which met the constitutive requirements of traffic accident escape and was convicted.
2. After the second accident, it is a typical criminal performance that endangers the public security in a dangerous way. Less than 3 years and less than 10 years, resulting in serious consequences ... ten will die. The charges are established. Upstairs, it's better to admit it's alcohol. China's criminal law stipulates that crimes committed after drinking should be investigated for responsibility.
To sum up, the perpetrator of this case should be punished with two crimes. Must be heavier!
I came to your question again and read all the answers. I have something to say:
Some people say that the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means cannot be established without great responsibility or death: whether an act constitutes a crime is one of them whether it is harmful to society. Take one thing for example, it cannot be said that it is not a crime without results; Second, in many cases, illegal crime and committing the same crime are from quantitative change to qualitative change, or from quantitative change to qualitative change. The perpetrator of this case suffered three minor injuries in a row, and the consequences were not small. Besides, he suffered three minor injuries. First, he was lucky, and so were the victims. But behind this kind of luck, there is a terrible social danger: that is, he caused different results in the same way.
Some people say it can't be a hit and run, and I don't agree with this view. The objective manifestation of this crime is that a traffic accident occurred and he fled the crime scene to avoid responsibility. These elements have been realized in this case. Since fleeing the scene, this crime has been committed and completed. There is no continuity or continuation between this crime and the following dangerous crimes, and the objects of the two crimes are different.
There is a sentencing principle in this case, that is, if both crimes are established, the term of imprisonment should be less than the sum of the two crimes and greater than the higher sentence. That is, the crime should be sentenced to three years, the dangerous crime should be sentenced to ten years, and the actual sentence should be: three plus less than ten years, more than ten years.
This kind of complex and praise is the best!