What's the answer from the lawyer in the easy chair of the crime master? The lawyer in the easy chair is the seventeenth level o
What's the answer from the lawyer in the easy chair of the crime master? The lawyer in the easy chair is the seventeenth level of mysterious decryption. Players need to answer six questions correctly to unlock the new level. Next, I will bring you an answer from the lawyer in the easy chair of the crime master. I hope it will help you.
Recommended reading: Summary of Mystery Decryption Answers
The lawyer sitting in the easy chair of the crime master replied 1. Answer list
The first question: Xiaohua
Question 2: 5
Question 3: Small ditch
Question 4: Windows
Question 5: 278
Question 6: cefijk
Second, the answer analysis
The first question:
This is an introductory topic of polygraph behavior. From the beginning of stealing things, the attraction of the mecha car to the little girls is small. It is said that Xiaomei cried, which is the embodiment of timid character, and the probability of stealing is extremely small.
Xiaomei, too, has her own doll. For Xiao Li, it can be judged that he is precocious in speech and behavior, interested in the game of switch game console, and the price of switch game console is relatively expensive, so the probability of his stealing with game console is relatively small.
Xiaohua is the most suspicious. In behavior, real anger begins slowly, gradually forms and then erupts. Suddenly knocking on the table is too radical. People who are really angry are consistent in their words and deeds, that is, they can't control their emotions when they speak, so they are too radical. Obviously Xiaohua is pretending to be angry. He is probably a thief.
The second question:
* * * There are five unreasonable points.
1: There are my own photos in the new book. Why does a loyal fan need to confirm my authorship? Unreasonable place.
This lady claimed that she came by bike. At the beginning of her signature, the sun was raining. She didn't bring an umbrella. Why didn't she show signs of getting wet? She is neat and smells like perfume. Unreasonable place.
The new book is called The Art of Profiling and Lie Detection, but this lady calls it The Art of Lie Detection and Profiling. A loyal fan won't say the title of his favorite author's new book wrong. Unreasonable place.
4. Ladies should not wear delicate makeup in order to catch up with time. Clothes will be a little messy because of cycling, so don't dress neatly. Unreasonable place.
5. it is eloquent. When describing the experience of a day, the order of washing, eating and making up is wrong. These three things will take some time to complete, and the real experience will form a deeper sequential memory. If you tell a lie, you can't describe it correctly. Pupillary dilation is a sign of nervousness, such as panic, anger, fear or seeing something you like. Obviously, this is panic. Touching your hand is a kind of body language to comfort yourself, and patting your forehead means regret. All kinds of body language and verbal contradictions reflect that the lady lied.
The third question:
There is no plum blossom painter in the textbook of the first grade of primary school. There is a verse children's poem in the first grade textbook 12, called? Little painter in the snow? The original text is:
It's snowing. It's snowing. A group of little painters came in the snow. Chickens draw bamboo leaves, dogs draw plum blossoms, ducklings draw maple leaves and ponies draw crescent moons. No paint, no pen, a few steps and a picture. Why didn't the frog take part? He fell asleep in the cave.
So the plum painter corresponds to the puppy, and the pinyin of the puppy is the decompression password: puppy.
The fourth question:
In the indictment, Wang Ming mentioned that when he came back from the window after picking vegetables, he caught a glimpse of Zhang Xiao poisoning the pot in the kitchen. According to the normal situation, the vegetable field is only near the living room window. If Wang Ming is in a hurry to cook noodles and go home after picking vegetables, in theory, he only passes through Zhang Xiao's living room window (green route), but the living room window is blocked by the kitchen wall and can't see Zhang Xiao's kitchen. Obviously, there is a contradiction here.
The fifth question:
In Zhang Xiao's confession, Zhang Xiao said that he walked to his home at 19: 20, then slept in the bedroom and got up at 20: 00 to go to the toilet, so Zhang Xiao was in the bedroom from 19: 20 to 20: 00, so Wang Ming couldn't have seen Zhang Xiao poisoning in the kitchen. In Wang Ming's testimony, answers 2, 7 and 8 all claimed to see Zhang Xiao in the kitchen, which was contradictory.
The sixth question:
Although Zhang Xiao lied and didn't pay alimony to Liu Lishui's parents, other confessions were basically true, and there was no key clue to overturn Zhang Xiao's confession. However, there are many doubts between Wang Ming's confession and Zhang Xiao's confession, so judging the authenticity of Wang Ming's confession is the key to this case. As soon as the old and new clues are integrated, a complete clue chain will introduce new results:
The first is clue E, the contradiction of Wang Ming in the prosecution opinion. According to the normal situation, the kitchen can't be seen, and this clue attracts attention.
Followed by clue one, the contradiction in the transcript of the first question. Here, the timelines of Wang Ming and Zhang Xiao are wrong, so some people's confessions are wrong, and they should be pointed out immediately after the contradictions in Wang Ming's indictment.
After that, it should be clue K. Here is a small detail that tells Wang Ming that he is nearsighted, that is, Zhang Xiao scolded Wang Ming. Lying with glasses on? Can refine Wang Ming's myopia.
Then there was clue C. Wang Ming broke his glasses on September 8 and got a new pair of glasses on September 1 1. This means that in September of 10, Wang Geng didn't wear glasses at the time of the crime. Because of his blurred vision, he probably misjudged someone.
Then there is the access clue J, Wang Ming's second interrogation record. In the transcript, although Wang Ming explained clearly why he went to Zhang Xiao's kitchen window, he obviously showed hesitation and no longer believed that he saw Zhang Xiao at that time.
The final key evidence is F, the result of field investigation. Paraquat was detected in the pot at the scene, and there were paraquat residues in the fried vegetables, which indicated that someone had fried vegetables in Zhang Xiaojia's kitchen pot and poisoned them. Paraquat remains on the kitchen floor, and the kitchen rag is also stained with paraquat, indicating that people who cook in the kitchen use paraquat to poison and wipe the paraquat that accidentally falls on the floor, which can rule out the possibility of poisoning by outsiders. Whoever cooks in the kitchen is the poisoner. According to Wang Ming's testimony, he did see someone cooking in the kitchen around 19: 35. If it's not Zhang Xiao, then only Liuli Water will cook in the kitchen!
This clue has nothing to do with this case. A can't prove that Zhang Xiao killed Liu Lishui, and there is no corresponding key clue. B belongs to the concept of facts and corresponds to a time axis. D is irrelevant to this case. I is the summary clue of GH, and the simultaneous GH can get the I clue, that is, the timeline of Wang Ming and Zhang Xiao does not match. When G and H are used as clues alone, new clues cannot be refined.
Third, the topic introduction
Today, it is the release time of your new book, The Art of Profiling and Lie Detection. However, something happened at your press conference. You skillfully solved the problem at the press conference, but after your press conference, you received an email from your lawyer friend Mr. Yin. In the email, Mr. Yin said that he was in urgent need of your help. I hope you can overturn a lawsuit of intentional homicide with him and win a lawsuit. This is not only a good friend's help, but also a challenge, so you accepted this help, and with the overthrow of many clues, you found that things were not simple?
Your task:
You are a profiler and a polygraph. You came home after the book launch and got help from your friends.
You need to look for clues from the file your good friend Mr. Yin gave you to overturn some conclusions.
You will experience six difficulties. Theoretically, you need to learn some knowledge about lie detection and defense.