What is murder innocence in Yellowstone National Park?

Accurately speaking, it is not "innocent murder" in Yellowstone National Park, but a criminal act that occurred in a specific area of Yellowstone National Park in the whole process. Due to contradictions in procedural law, the trial may not be possible. Friends who are interested in further understanding this issue can look at the paper "Perfect Crime" published by Brian C. Kalt, a criminal law scholar, in 2005. I will briefly describe Professor Kalt's exposition on this issue here. There are two concepts in American criminal procedure:

1. place of trial: the place where criminal trial should be held. According to Article 18 of the Federal Procedural Law, the place should be set in the place where the crime occurred, which is basically stipulated in the state litigation procedures;

2. Neighborhood: the area where the jury is produced in the trial, and the jurors are randomly selected from the adult citizens in this area; These two concepts are linked by the Sixth Amendment: the suspect has the right to be tried by neutral jurors in the state and district where the crime occurred, and according to the Judicial Act 1789, the Congress has the right to delimit the jurisdiction of criminal cases, without completely conforming to the state boundaries. For example, xiong'an new area belongs to Hebei Province in administrative division, but the National People's Congress decided that xiong'an new area's criminal cases should be under the jurisdiction of the Beijing People's Court, which led to inconsistency between judicial jurisdiction and administrative demarcation. (This is not the case, just for the convenience of understanding, give an overhead example. In most cases, even if there is a problem that the jurisdiction area and the mainland boundary do not overlap, we can always find the overlapping area and select jurors from it, such as finding the residents of Hebei Province living in the jurisdiction of the Beijing Municipal Court, which is similar to the concept of "intersection" in mathematics. Therefore, the contradiction between the site and the adjacent areas has not attracted people's attention. However, an area of about 50 square miles in Yellowstone National Park stumped the jurist. The area belongs to Wyoming in the concept of criminal jurisdiction and Idaho in the administrative division of state boundaries. Therefore, according to the original text of the Sixth Amendment, if someone commits a crime in this area, citizens belonging to both Wyoming and Idaho should serve as jurors.