In daily study, work or life, many people have the experience of writing essays and are familiar with them. The composition must focus on the theme and elaborate on the same theme in depth. Ramblings, loose topics or even no topics are prohibited. In order to make your writing easier and more convenient, here are 8 debate essays I compiled. I hope it will be helpful to you.
Debate Essay 1 The little reporter has a charity activity "Give me a dream of being a lawyer - Climbing Little Lawyer Activity."
After hearing this, I immediately signed up happily. Soon, I received a notification. I successfully covered the event and I jumped with joy.
I got there, wrote a personal report, and started. I received two questions, 1: Who do you think the New Year’s money should be given to? In fact, I have also thought about this issue, but sometimes I don’t think too much about it. We can say that because money is given to us by adults, it naturally belongs to us. Of course, I'm also considering it for adults. It can be said that because adults give to others, others will also give to you, so this is for adults, so I choose to give it to us. I said: "What you are talking about to us is naturally our own." However, the other party also followed my inference and said: "If you give it to others, others will give it to you, so this is for adults." The classmate next to me commented: "This money means reciprocity, of course it should be given to us!" "But if you don't give money to others, will others give it to you?" As soon as he finished speaking, a classmate took it and said, "...ah...ah...ah... ...Ah...
The second topic is: If you are trapped on a train track, you have a track change button in your hand, but the button leads to a track. One was tied to the old man, and the other was tied to the child. What would happen to you? I cut off the child first, because the child is the youngest and has the longest lifespan and does not deserve to die. And now I am thinking whether I will die by myself or by the old man. The old man said this because his life has come to an end, and I still have a long life, but the car is driving towards me. What qualifications do I have to change the fate of others? So, I said: "The car is driving towards me." . What qualifications do I have to change the fate of others? "So I think I should die." As soon as I said it, everyone agreed!
At the end, the teachers gave us a small lawyer's license. We got the lawyer's license and took photos with the lawyers. I was all smiles and very happy.
At this time, I must feel that this is my happiest moment.
Debate Competition Essay 2 This afternoon, our class held a wonderful debate competition, which was really lively.
The teacher first clearly wrote the topic of the debate on the blackboard: "Can watching TV online replace traditional reading?". As the representative of the opponent, I fought side by side with my teammates, Wang, and Chang Haoran, and killed the enemy bravely. Certainly there are, Ding, etc., they are all energetic.
The debate I was looking forward to has finally begun. The active Wan Ming Ting first expressed his opinions and gave a long speech on the issue of "pre-emptive strike". However, our teammates did not back down, and Wan Mingting simply put the opponent's point of view to the fullest. As soon as her words fell, I immediately "accepted": "We do not believe that watching TV online can replace traditional reading for four reasons..." This sentence broke the theme.
The first step of the Long March was successful, and I was secretly happy.
But things are far from as simple as I thought. The talented Liu Sibo pointed out some shortcomings of traditional reading, which is quite offensive. Fortunately, the eloquent, witty and funny Liu Zijian saved us from ruin with real life examples and a lot of information. Seeing that the situation was not going well, I hurriedly used legal weapons to "punch out of the air" without giving the other party a chance to provoke or refute. Wang hurriedly picked up my words again.
At this time, the other party is like an ant on a hot pot - running around! Kanazawa blushed and kept giving hints to his "think tank". It seemed they had nothing to argue with. Then the teacher said: "Stop!" Let the pros and cons explain the key points. We all felt that we still had more to say.
This debate was really exciting and we all benefited a lot.
In this debate, I sharpened my eloquence and broadened my knowledge. It made me understand that in our lives, we need to have a clear point of view and eloquence in order to adapt to this society when we grow up.
Debate Essay 3: Our class had a heated debate. Teacher Wu said seriously: "The topic of our discussion this time is whether it is beneficial to open books?" Boys are positive and girls are negative.
At the beginning of the debate, as an active debater, I was eager to give it a try and had something to say in my heart. From big stories to small examples, he told them plausibly and methodically, and his focus immediately shifted to the front.
Seeing that the situation was not good, opponent Wang Ruitong "wisely" moved to the third debate before the free debate began. The heavy responsibility fell on Lei Kuang's new son, and the opponent kept cheering.
After saying a few words, Lei Kuang was interrupted by a classmate. Teacher: "Don't interrupt the debaters." That's not what I meant. The classmate said: "Her voice is too soft, I can't hear it at all!" The whole class immediately made the same sound. Pro: "Yes, I can't hear you!" "I can't hear you!" Opponent: "Let's find someone else, the voice is too low..."
The teacher quickly maintained discipline. "Nowadays, some students are addicted to martial arts novels, and some even say that they can jump off the stairs lightly..." The teacher said: "I don't think it is beneficial to open the book."
Then it is time for free debate. . Everyone is arguing fiercely... The front will let a few famous debaters appear first to attract the opponent's main force, and then let Wu Yikang and other seemingly inconspicuous but awesome people attack, without allowing the opponent's other debaters to interrupt.
It is commendable that the opponent did not surrender because of such a huge gap. It's commendable, but morale is getting lower and lower. So Mr. Wu spoke for the opposition. The girls' hearts are "jumping up and down", which represents excitement and ghostly laughter. Most boys' hearts are "jumping up and down...". Represents anxiety and discussion. And my heart was "beating-da-beating-da-", which means taking a deep breath (because it was impossible not to be nervous at that time, so I used deep breathing to force myself to calm down) and nervously thinking about one answer after another.
Time is running out. A beautiful eight-part essay, with a sharp cold light shining everywhere, came out - a pot of delicious golden and tempting but poisonous bread.
At this time, the whole class fell silent, and dozens of pairs of eyes searched and patrolled to see who had the "antidote" for this bread. And I don’t care, I’m developing this “antidote”.
I thought about it and found that what the other side said was a loophole in "opening books is beneficial": harmful books. Therefore, I think that as long as the loopholes are filled, that is, as long as a person is reasonable and selective when reading, the situation described by the opposing party will not occur. The quality of the book depends on the person who reads it. This leaves the opposing side speechless.
So I didn’t blush and defined the book as harmless. Then he said, "It's like killing someone with a Tibetan sword, but you can't say, 'This knife is too sharp. I just touched him with the knife, but the person died as soon as I touched it!' "" Take a breath and continue: "Books have no emotions and souls." What matters is how you perceive the quality of the book. ”
The words were amazing, and the teacher also admitted that I had quarreled with her. This completely discouraged the other party who originally smiled and then frowned. So after the other party made some unnecessary resistance, she was persuaded after class. Yes, the affirmative won.
Debate Essay 4 This weekend, our family held another wonderful debate. The theme of this debate was "Is it beneficial to read more?" It's Orthodox, my sister and my mother are the villains. And my father is the referee, and the debate begins.
First of all, I stood up and said, "Gorky once said, 'Books are the progress of mankind. 's ladder'. This is enough to illustrate Gorky's love for books and also express the importance of books to us. So reading is beneficial and harmless. "I collected Gorky's words from the Internet, and I quoted famous quotes, which will definitely make the opposing party unable to deal with it. But to my surprise, my sister said calmly: "Gorky's words are good, but what he said Book does not refer to a specific book. "So we believe that not all books are good for you to read. Some books are bad for you."
"
I quickly stood up and said, "Then...that book is an indispensable tool for our study. It can enable us to learn a lot of knowledge and bring us a lot of inspiration. As long as it is a book, if you read more, you will definitely gain something and you will definitely grow. "I racked my brains and finally made up a paragraph. At this time, my mother said: "I am against positive views. Not all books are good, some can be harmful. Everything has its two sides, and books are no exception. If you read the book, you will gain something. But reading a bad book can harm your physical and mental health. Just like medicine, you can't take it randomly, otherwise there will be side effects. In our opinion, reading is not necessarily beneficial. To some extent, it can even be harmful. "
My mother's words are like a heavy iron fist hitting my head. I really can't find any words to deal with it. I will look at my brother for help, and he will think hard at this time. However, my brother still He stood up: “Reading should be beneficial. Since ancient times, books have been used by ancient people to record things. Not only that, since ancient times, which literati is not full of knowledge and talent? Even the ancients believed that reading is a kind of wisdom, so why is it said that reading is useless now? What the other side says is certainly reasonable. But most books are still useful. Even if a small part is harmful to the book, it is insignificant. Therefore, reading is still beneficial. "As soon as he finished speaking, my father clapped his hands because my brother spoke so well. The other party was speechless and had to lose.
This debate was really interesting. Although I almost missed what I just said dialogue, but with the help of my brother, I won. I was still very happy in my heart. From this debate, I understood that reading is beneficial. Only by reading more can you learn more knowledge and wealth. .
Today, the debate that our class has been waiting for is finally here!
The moderator explained some of the rules of the debate and announced the positive opinions of both sides. The point of view is: "Be honest, don't lie", and the opposite point of view is: "Life sometimes requires white lies." "Next, let's debate the positive side." As soon as the host finished speaking, the game began.
Ye Xiuqi, who held an affirmative view, suddenly stood up and expressed his affirmative view. What impressed me most was that he said, "No matter whether it is to our relatives, friends or people we don't know, lies are inevitable. There are many purposes, but when we add 'good intention' to lies, everyone may accept it, but this is a concentrated expression of human weakness. "After hearing the positive point of view, Chen Dinghui immediately stood up and expressed the opposing point of view. The host stood up and said that the opposing party can debate and state their own views, which shows how eager Chen Dinghui is.
The debate was going on, and it was the most exciting free debate session for everyone! During the free debate stage, everyone was listening with great interest. The first and fourth debaters on the other side, Chen Dinghui and Li Jianguang, were very strong, but the pros and cons were not to be outdone. I remember the debate. At that time, the opponent's debater was already on pins and needles, immediately seizing the opponent's loopholes, just like a tiger immediately grasping meat. The plot that impressed me most was the two time bombs Yi Xianyang mentioned in the quadrant debate. One is explosive power. A small credibility bomb, one is a white lie with great explosive power. In addition, there are examples such as the military dog ??Heizi, which is so convincing! Another example is the text cited by Li Jianguang, the four arguments of the opponent. . He will debate according to the other party's ideas, and his thinking is active... There are many wonderful speeches that make people immersed...
I will never forget this debate! Everyone had wonderful speeches. In this way, a fierce "war of words" ended.
Debate Competition Composition 6 Today, our second class Changjiang held a wonderful debate competition.
As Teacher Apple gave the order, our Chen Kexin stood up and said: "Playing games can broaden your horizons! ""....The opposition was silent. Suddenly, Li Jiahui raised her right hand: "Playing games will affect your eyesight!" I said sternly: "As long as you don't play with your mobile phone for a long time, your eyesight will not be affected, and you can learn a lot by learning software. Mobile Game Yingda said enthusiastically: “Using your phone on the road is dangerous.
"Our Ding Binbin was suddenly mentioned by the teacher, but he said calmly: "Do you have to play on the road? "Mobile phones can help primary school students solve many problems!" My opponent Li Jiahui stood up again and said anxiously: "Mobile phones have radiation, which will affect the physical and mental health of primary school students." I went all out and said: "Mobile phones have small radiation, and everything in the world has radiation. . The mobile phone can also be used to learn software such as CDs! ""
This time, I won the title of debate king, and I also learned that some people use the mobile phone as a double-edged sword. Some people use it to learn knowledge.
On Friday afternoon, in the second Chinese class, our fifth (2) class held a special debate. The debaters were blushing.
The theme of this debate is "Advertising is not trustworthy". The "think tanks" of both sides are forming up and preparing to fight. The four winning debaters are Chuan, an eloquent debater. , Li Chengyu, a witty debater, Xu, a steady debater, and Xu, a smart debater. The opposing debaters are more powerful, such as the eloquent and confident Zhai Jingru, Lu and Tang Yuxin. Sitting neatly on the seats, looking at the debaters from all directions, the class teacher Chen was also waiting to see who would win the title of "Best Debater".
In the first stage, Both sides argued their points, and the opposing side preemptively argued that Yang Tingyu said, "I don't think advertising is credible because we sometimes listen to advertising, but in the end we are deceived. I believe that the 80 students in the class have personal experience. Please raise your hands if you believe in my classmates! "More than half of the students in the class raised their hands. This scene gave Ye Qingchuan a warning. Ye Qingchuan was not to be outdone. He thought, if you lose people's hearts at the beginning, what better? He said: "I think advertising is Believable. There are no ads, you don't know what to buy etc. Hey, hey, look, there are still many people in the class who don’t buy it, hum! "Yang Tingyu thought hard and tried her best. He rolled his eyes and stood up immediately, eloquent and humorous: "Look at that eZubao, how big a company it is, and it even advertised on CCTV. . Isn't this still a scam? Before the affirmative had time to respond, Zhai Jingru, the second counter-arguer, picked up the manuscript and gave another example. He and Yang Tingyu echoed each other's embarrassing positive aspects. Chen Qiuguo, who had a positive opinion, immediately stood up and said: "Those are just a few exceptions, and they are not It does not affect the authenticity of the advertisement. Most advertising is true. "The other party's Sanbian Lu shouted loudly: "As long as there are false advertisements, they cannot be trusted. It is better to kill a thousand by mistake than to let one go. "Xu and Li Chengyu argued the case three times, colluding with each other in unison: "You are just messing around. Don't look at what you say so plausibly. Is that public service announcement also fake? "Ye Qingchuan talked about the authenticity of public service advertisements and the practicality of encouraging people to do good deeds at lightning speed. The spitting star almost flew into Yang Tingyu's eyes, and Tang Yuxin turned the corner....... ................................................................. ................................................................. ...........
But, I am still thinking, who is right and who is wrong? Yes, all aspects must be considered at all times, and one must not accept partial beliefs, so that the false and the true can be eliminated. Be invincible by doing things.
In the ethics class on Tuesday afternoon, our class burst into thunderous applause. Do you know what we were doing? We were having a debate about the benefits of opening books.
We are divided into two sides, one is the positive side and the other is the negative side. Under the command of Teacher Han, our opponent overwhelmed the opponent in terms of momentum. She spoke first. She thought that opening books was beneficial and listed many useful examples and famous quotes. After she finished speaking, our captain also spoke. She thought that opening books was not necessarily beneficial, because there were many unhealthy books and various kinds of books. Such books mixed together, leading people to embark on the road of crime. As soon as the captains of the two sides confronted each other, the debate turned into an angry battle. Next, Fang Zheng advocated that Huang Shuyang made a speech.
She said that reading unhealthy books can improve her ability to recognize books, and she will never recognize the wrong books again. As soon as Huang Shuyang sat down and the opposing side argued, Fan Jiani stood up and gave many examples of "opening the book may not be beneficial" in an attempt to refute the positive side.
Time flies, and soon it’s time for free debate. At this time, the atmosphere in the classroom became lively, as hot as the sun on the equator, and the debate suddenly entered a heated stage. Everyone's cheeks were red and very excited. Everyone, you are holding me back and making a big fuss. Suddenly, Lizzie, the captain of the opposing team, said: "Xuan Shumiao, our defensive friend, you are hesitating. It shows that opening a book may not be beneficial!" As soon as she finished speaking, the other party was speechless, and continued after a while. Time passed minute by second, and in the end, Lizzie was named the best debater, but the pros and cons were tied.
Although we didn’t win the debate, it made me incredibly happy. I love debating! Hope to have another debate next time!
;