1. Solicitation of mock trial's role
2. Statement of facts by both parties
3. Summary of controversial points
4. Court debate
5. Court review
6. Publication of judgment
2. mock trial Rules
1. Solicitation of mock trial's role <
Note: As the activities are conducted online, the relevant evidence exchange and the exchange of opinions between the prosecution and the defense cannot be conducted in person. Especially in the case of a large number of lawyers, there may be no exchange of opinions between lawyers. Therefore, all materials need to be reported to the clerk, who will summarize and screen the materials.
2. Both parties state facts, provide evidence and cross-examine
The lawyers of the original and the defendant will hand over all the facts or evidence that are publicly disclosed by the media to the clerk, and the clerk will record them accordingly, so as to prepare for awards (as "best company lawyer", "best company lawyer team", "best presenter", "best defender" and "enthusiastic juror", etc.
the lawyers of both parties will sort out all the materials provided into the indictment, defense and evidence list, and send the sorted documents to both parties and judges, and publish them on the website.
The lawyers of both parties give cross-examination opinions according to the published indictment, defense statement and evidence list. Cross-examination opinions should be summarized to the clerk, who will sort out and summarize them into complete cross-examination opinions, copy them to both parties and judges and publish them on the website, and make relevant records for future use.
3. Summary of the focus of disputes
The sole judge will summarize the focus of disputes according to the above documents and publish the focus of disputes on the website.
4. Debate
The two parties debated the focus of the dispute in combination with the other party's cross-examination. The rules are as follows: the plaintiff first debates and summarizes them to the clerk, who will make a unified debate record, copy it to the judge and the opposing lawyer and publish it on the website. According to the plaintiff's opinions and cross-examination opinions, the defendant's lawyer put forward the focus of the debate and summarized it to the clerk, who made a unified debate opinion, copied it to the judge and the opposing lawyer and published it on the website. To a certain time or turn.
5. Court Review
The jury comprehensively considers the indictment, defense words, evidence list, cross-examination opinions, debate opinions, etc., and decides whether the facts of infringement or breach of contract are established and gives corresponding reasons respectively. Decide whether the defendant has the fact of infringement or breach of contract by voting.
the above voting opinions and reasons are summarized at the clerk's office, who will make a unified voting opinion, send a copy to the judges and lawyers, and publish it on the website.
6. Publish the judgment
The judge makes a judgment based on the facts, writes a judgment and publishes it on the website.
7. Follow-up
As many facts will be discovered continuously, which may have an impact on the determination of facts, the above process may be started repeatedly with the emergence of new facts, and multiple judgments will be made.
Third, expert review
Experts are invited to comment on the opinions expressed in the activities, and certain awards are selected, such as "Best Company Lawyer", "Best Company Lawyer Team", "Best Agent", "Best Defense" and "Enthusiastic Juror". This website will present awards to the winning lawyers. This website will commend the winning lawyers and report and publicize their works in a series of special topics.