First of all, the court is the fairest place in life. For a law judge, giving him money will only increase the judge's recent negative influence and may be counterproductive to himself. Judges generally need an objective public when judging cases. If they are judged unfairly, they may appeal to a higher court, causing unnecessary losses, so it will not be useful for judges to send money.
Secondly, lawyers are mainly responsible for providing legal services for themselves. As for the moral standards that lawyers should have, he understands the consequences of doing so. So, maybe this lawyer is not a professional lawyer, so I suggest to find a professional lawyer. Problems that can be solved by money are generally not solved by the court.
Extended data:
For the court, the court is a relatively fair place in the world. When we solve problems through the court, as long as we state and express ourselves realistically and provide reasonable evidence, the court will make a ruling on the basis of justice and facts and make a fair judgment that conforms to the vast majority of people.
If there is any ambiguity about the judgment, you can appeal to a higher court and then choose the judgment in a higher court. Generally speaking, the court's judgment will consider justice and facts, and lawyers also need to choose according to their own actual situation. It may be more useful to choose some professional lawyers.