Personally, I think you have two choices. Turn a blind eye to the first choice. This choice will not have any side effects except making your conscience a little uncomfortable. The second is to call 1 10 to call the police, but ... if you really want to do it, I suggest that you must ask the police or the judge for approval and support, grasp a degree, a red heart, two preparations, be brave, or be fined for excessive behavior, or bear certain medical expenses.
If spending tens of thousands or more doesn't matter to you and doesn't affect your family life, then make bold moves. Maybe you stopped each other, maybe you were stabbed by each other. If it affects your family life, it means that you have no responsibility to the person you love, sorry for your parents, sorry for your children, and sorry for your lover in the middle. You just want to be brave. Of course, if you are willing to put righteousness above family members, uphold justice, and safeguard social morality, you should worry about the world first and enjoy it later. This is a big mind. I bow and salute you, but I won't learn from you?
It's hard to say anything before, but since the "Kunshan Longge" anti-killing incident and the "Yu" incident, the whole society has begun to pay attention to the defects of China's "self-defense" system and the exemption system for doing good deeds. To this end, the Supreme People's Procuratorate has issued a series of guiding cases, clarifying the identification of self-defense when I or others are infringed by law in reality?
The Supreme People's Procuratorate's guiding cases make it clear that the counterattack against unlawful infringement in these cases belongs to self-defense: 1. Predicting that someone intentionally hurts himself and carries self-defense weapons such as knives with him does not affect the determination of justifiable defense. If someone cuts you with a knife, you can bravely cut it back. Someone cuts you with a knife, you cut it back with a knife. Cut it and ran away. If you feel unsafe, you can continue to chase. As long as the injuring party shows the possibility of committing a crime, the injured party can defend like a crime?
At the same time, Zhou Qiang, President of the Supreme Court, pointed out in reviewing the main work in 20 18 that the Supreme Court "supports citizens to crack down on criminal acts through self-defense, protect the righteous and promote social integrity.
Back to the question, according to the Supreme People's Procuratorate's guidance and the encouragement and support of the Supreme Law, the behavior mentioned by the subject can now be considered as self-defense and does not bear legal responsibility. At the same time, governments at all levels can also reward courageous acts?
The current judicial environment is getting better and better. In the process of social development, there will always be a gloomy era, society will always progress and everything will develop well.