Although I passed the judicial examination in 2006, I am not a lucky one. After all, I took the exam three times before I finally passed. Personally, I feel that the first year is trying, the second year is thinking, and the third year is fighting. In the course of these three years, I think the most important thing is the mentality, a mentality of contentment, a mentality of being dissatisfied with learning, and a peaceful mentality of not giving up until you reach your goal! After all, Sike is called the biggest exam in China by the industry. After all, not everyone can pass it at once, so it is particularly important to keep a normal heart in this process! As the saying goes, be responsive; It is also reasonable to seek perfection and get what you deserve in the judicial examination process. Only by pursuing, standing high and walking wide can we achieve the exam!
Speaking of specific methods, I want to say three things. The first is to choose a good set of teaching materials (personally, I think the lecture series of IWC is better); The second is to do real questions repeatedly. In previous years, the real questions were the most authoritative tutors, who could help you find the feeling of doing the questions and find a shortcut to pass the judicial examination. The third is to establish a set of wrong questions, constantly sort them out in the usual practice, and then read the wrong questions repeatedly, study the wrong questions, and strive to be wrong only once!
After all, the judicial examination is only a small post in life. Through it, it only gives us an evaluation and positioning as a legal person. The road ahead is still long, and the sunshine is just right. Let's continue to sail in youth!
king
I passed the judicial examination this time, not because of luck or chance, but because I firmly believe that "no pains, no gains". When asked about the feeling of taking the exam, I want to talk about the difference between preparing for the exam this year and last year.
Last year, I learned that the IWC series textbooks had a good reputation, so I took this set of textbooks as my main reference for review, and then I took part in a correspondence course in the intensive stage of IWC system (the correspondence course recorded the teacher's lectures on tape and sent them to students). I didn't do any exercises, including real questions, and I didn't have many opinions. Due to the lack of review efforts, I have a dependence and luck on the role of remedial classes. I didn't look at the laws and real questions I should see, and my seriousness was obviously not as good as this year, which finally made me 30 points behind the score line.
After summing up the reasons for last year's failure, I made a "two-round review plan" this year. In the first round, I carefully read the three major books of Law Publishing House and interpreted a key law article. This stage occupies most of my whole review time, which lasts until the beginning of August. I didn't attend remedial classes this year, but I still listened to tapes of subjects that didn't change much last year. The students who took the exam together this year gave me some free materials from the internet. I listened to the information of the remedial class after reading the book that day to consolidate it. I think these things are very helpful to me, at least they can play a role in combing and guiding. In the second round, read textbooks from various countries and do real questions (doing real questions is very important, and a set of real questions compiled by Zhang Nengbao is good). The teaching materials of the world are focused and famous for their "precision". Looking at it in the second round will help me focus on reviewing my knowledge. In the last two or three days before the exam, I quickly passed a general textbook. My foundation is not very good, and there is a big gap compared with the students who graduated from professional law schools. In addition, a certain amount of textbooks from various countries were accumulated last year, so the "Three Big Books" were chosen as the first round and main review bibliography this year, and then strengthened with textbooks from various countries. In terms of time arrangement, I don't recommend stretching the front too long, otherwise it will be very tired or even boring in the end. For two years, I have reviewed for about four months at a time.
I applied for the judicial exam three times, but I didn't mention it the first time. At that time, I just went to graduate school, and my impetuous mood made me feel a little high. Not only did I not review, but I also hoped for a miracle in the examination room. The score of 273 points left me no experience, but it taught me a profound lesson: no pains, no gains? I hope my lesson can serve as a warning to all of you. We should take the exam seriously and treat everything in a down-to-earth manner.
Yang
This is a thrilling pass, and there may be a lot of luck. It is impossible to say that you have successful experience, but summing up your own mistakes and experiences may help students to take fewer detours.
This year, I chose a set of counseling books with good reputation, namely, Wanguo's ((special lectures), which are real topics over the years, and participated in Wanguo's online cram school (lecture stage of legal articles series). The review also began in mid-June. I read the textbook for the second time in August, and listened to the network recording at the same time. I took notes on all the recordings. I feel that having a teacher review can save a lot of energy.
Moreover, you can review with a purpose, you can take a lot of detours less, and when you record with notes, it is also a kind of strengthening memory. In the final sprint stage, short notes have many benefits. The real question was done for half a month, and finally I made a final sprint with my notes. 362 points, a score that cannot be boasted, can't prove anything, but at least my efforts have paid off. Here are some tips for this exam:
1. Perseverance and confidence in success. It is darkest before dawn, and the last stage of the Long March is the most painful. After a long period of review and preparation, about a week before the exam is the time when you want to give up most. You will feel so dark that you almost don't want to turn a page. I told my classmates at that time that it was disgusting to see books. In fact, the examination room is like a long-distance race. As long as you persist and stand on the field, you must have confidence in yourself and constantly remind yourself that persistence is victory.
Second, the choice of teaching materials. Personally, a good textbook should not only have clear and concise theoretical content, but also have cases that make the finishing point, and it is best to have relevant laws and regulations as reference. I think "special lectures" are close to this standard. Although I feel that the content of the first book is somewhat omitted after the exam (students can supplement it with the first book of the legal edition), it is a set of books with a fairly good level on the whole, which can save you a lot of detours. Books are expensive in nature, and too much information can only distract you. Based on a set of relatively good teaching materials, you can always get good results by summing up your studies repeatedly, as long as you are careful.
Third, the choice of exercises. Some students like to carry out sea tactics, but test questions can't replace the role of repeatedly memorizing textbooks and summarizing the framework of departmental law. Doing too many questions can only let you go deep into the details, but not rise to the knowledge point of grasping the whole legal system as a whole. I think the real questions over the years are the best exercises. Every year, a considerable number of questions are changed from the real questions of previous years. As long as you thoroughly understand the relevant knowledge points of the question and make it change, you can always control it easily.
Fourth, learn to give up. The content of the judicial examination is quite extensive, and it is impossible to use the same energy in every part. We should focus on reviewing the six major departmental laws that occupy a considerable proportion in the judicial examination, namely, civil law, criminal law, administrative law and related procedural law. The mastery of them determines the level of the judicial examination results. For other small methods, we should not say that we don't look at them, but pay attention to the key points. For example, many small laws in economic law can be browsed on the basis of understanding, and some can even be abandoned at the last minute. This is the truth of giving up what you get.
V. About whether to choose remedial classes. I think it depends on the specific situation. If you are conscious and have a specific review plan, I personally think that remedial classes are unnecessary. You can download relevant handouts from the internet and review them with the teaching materials, which is equally effective. If you are not conscious enough, you can make up lessons or download the recording of the lecture. A good teacher can lead you to read a book in a planned way and make up the missed knowledge, and the effect is quite obvious.
Generally speaking, strength plus luck is the secret of all exams. Maybe destiny didn't take care of you this year, but if you make considerable efforts, success will belong to you after all.
Xie xinxing
Obtaining judicial professional qualification certificate is the dream of each of us who study law, and it is also an essential element for us to engage in legal work. So, how to successfully pass the judicial examination in a limited review time? Next, I want to talk about my own personal experience.
First of all, I think the most important thing is to find a suitable set of materials, which will make auditors do more work. The discerning person can tell whether a set of wrong data is better or worse than a set of carefully compiled data. In the choice of materials, I recommend the set of materials published by IWC, and personally feel good.
Secondly, don't use sea tactics and fast speed to ensure passing the judicial examination, because the judicial examination is a test of ability, which can not be solved by sea tactics. All legal knowledge points should be clarified, especially the true connotation and application of legal principles and its exceptional application.
Thirdly, we should master the laws and regulations skillfully, but it is absolutely impossible to recite only the laws and regulations in the judicial examination.
In addition, it is best to be proficient in understanding every question in the judicial examination. The so-called understanding is not only to understand the answer to this question, but also to understand the knowledge content and jurisprudence of this part of the textbook, which is also the consolidation of mastering the knowledge points of the textbook. It is also important to note that you should not do any simulation questions without completing the questions in previous years, because there is no simulation question closer to the measurement standard of judicial examination than the questions in previous years.
Also, don't spend a long time preparing for the judicial examination, which will only make people more tired and lose more. Two to three months of review time is the best time.
Finally, remember, don't pin your hopes of passing the judicial examination on guessing and gambling, because you will often find that guessing and gambling actually failed the examination. But when you find this, it will be too late. We can only hope for next year. But what will happen next year? That is another unknown.
To sum up, I want to emphasize that the judicial examination is actually about the legal basis, and there will be no profound theory to master and understand the basic principles of law. The so-called puzzle is just a complicated inference of ordinary situations. Therefore, to learn the foundation of legal knowledge well, it is best to set such a goal from the time of undergraduate. Our study of law is not a complicated accumulation of legal knowledge, but a legal principle, a legal spirit summed up from laws, regulations and complicated book knowledge. If a law student can understand this, then he really understands the law and it will be easier to pass the judicial examination.
Finally, I wish all law students can successfully pass the judicial examination!
Lainka
Judicial examination, only.
Judicial examination is a mountain, difficult to climb?
Judicial examination is a big river, can't you cross it?
Judicial examination is a castle, which can't be conquered for a long time?
Judicial examination is a tiger, vicious?
Mount Everest can still be climbed.
The Red Army crossed the Yangtze River and the Yellow River.
Sparta, vassal of Rome!
Judicial examination, paper tiger!
Please remember:
Judicial examination, only test!
confidence
determination
willpower
Take care of the exam!
Please remember:
Judicial examination, only test!
inhale air
courage
luck
Never give up!
Please remember:
Judicial examination, only test!
Not the end,
But starting point!
Yang jifu