First, why was he claimed?
In fact, the reason is very simple, that is, some consumers know that China's "Food Safety Law" and "Agricultural Products Quality Safety Law" stipulate that all goods sold need to be labeled. Buy other people's goods through such loopholes without warning, and then make a claim. There is nothing wrong with his behavior, but his behavior is indeed morally unacceptable.
Second, the interpretation given by the lawyer.
Lawyers also said that there is nothing wrong with consumers' behavior. China's Food Safety Law clearly stipulates that consumers can claim damages from operators after purchasing food that does not meet food safety standards. Generally, compensation shall be paid at ten times the price paid or three times the loss caused. If the compensation amount is not enough to reach 1 1,000 yuan, compensation shall be made according to the standard of 1 1,000 yuan.
Third, how to rely on this matter?
First of all, I think he, as a farmer, sold his sauerkraut without considering the legal risks. Of course, he can't criticize. But if you are a consumer to buy good and cheap goods, seize this point. Tough claims can indeed be supported by law. Of course, the market supervision bureau has also investigated this matter and verified it. But morally, many netizens can't stand it, and I feel immoral.