1. How is the potential defined?
I have a different view on Qu, who is defined by the judges as a person with more potential. In the last two seasons, Qu performed well, but only chose a relatively good one among the shortcomings. If it is in real life and the workplace, everything should be difficult to pass. The argument that Qu has potential may be that Qu did not perform well at the beginning of the interview, which led to the lawyer's low expectations for his later performance, but everyone did not perform well in the latter two periods, which shows that Qu is not bad. Compared with other interns, lawyers think Qu has great potential. I think the potential is that you have performed well, but you can give the leader a bigger surprise in the next thing. Of course, it is not limited to career, and it is better every time. This is the true meaning of potential, but this is also my personal opinion.
2. For what? Old man? High expectations do not mean denying others' achievements.
Compared with Qu, I think Ding Hui is a better person in this debate, but the reason given by the judges is that Ding Hui has one year's work experience and they have higher expectations for him. This statement confuses me. After all, this is the first debate in which Hui Ding participated. No experience, no one is playing for the first time. Because Hui Ding has experience in other fields, it is unfair to deny his performance in the debate.
Although a person's potential is very important in his work, it is meaningful to do it in a way that is fair to all.