On September 28, 2020, the Higher People's Court of Guizhou Province publicly pronounced the case of Li's intentional homicide and Meng Ruihong's cover-up, ruled that the original judgments of the first and second instance were revoked and sent back to Liupanshui Intermediate People's Court for retrial.
At this point, 200 1 Guizhou Li's case of killing his wife and son once again attracted widespread attention. This may have been one of many old cases retried by the state. Since ancient times, people who handle cases will not make mistakes, but it is inevitable that mistakes may lead to unjust, false and wrong cases. If Li was expected in those years, then I believe that with the strong support of this country, Li will definitely wash away the injustice, but if Li deserves it, then he will definitely not escape the legal sanctions.
However, one of the reasons why Li's case has caused widespread controversy in the whole country is that one of the complainants who ran for Li's conviction has a very special identity. She is Zhang, the biological mother of the victim Xie Chuming, who is 77 years old this year. In fact, Xie Chuming's biological father, Xie, was also a member of Li, but Xie died of illness several years ago.
So, what caused the victim's parents to shout for the suspect? In fact, the fact is obvious, because in the face of existing evidence, they all think that Li is wronged! Therefore, this makes the case of Li get a high degree of attention. With the further publication of the case, more and more people think that Li is wronged.
So here, I boldly guess that Li will eventually be acquitted and get the corresponding compensation from the state with great probability. As for the reason, it is not simply because of the support of the victim's parents, but the evidence left in that year is really not enough to support Li's murder. In other words, Li's case is full of doubts.
First of all, because there is no body of the victim in this case, there is no scientific conclusion about the cause of death of the victim, and all the results depend on the confession left by the suspect.
Secondly, there is doubt about the real time of the victim's murder. The original appraisal agency determined that the victim was killed at 3 am on March 20th, 200 1 year, but this time is just a guess. Later, Li's appeal lawyer speculated that the victim's time of murder should be between 22: 30 and 23: 30 on March 60 19, so which time of murder is the most reasonable, which also needs textual research.
Third, without fully investigating the way of death of the victim, the judicial organs identified a kitchen knife in Li Jiazhong as a crime tool according to the testimony of some witnesses, and the crime mode was dismemberment, but the kitchen knife did not leave any cutting marks at that time, which made people wonder whether the kitchen knife was really a crime tool and whether the crime mode was as Li and others had previously confessed.
Finally, Li complained many times in court, claiming that he was tortured to extract a confession and asked for a retraction. Because of this, Xie Chuming's parents also realized some doubts and insisted on visiting Li despite the opposition of their families. After several contacts and communication with Li, they determined that Li was a wanted man, so they began to appeal for Li everywhere.
Through the above signs, it can almost be concluded that the evidence in Li's case is insufficient to identify Li as the murderer in this case.
Although Li cheated his wife before marriage, he also let her down, but as he himself said, he learned from a bitter experience and was forgiven by his wife and Zhang. I believe what Li said is true. He must be full of hope for his case, otherwise his 20-year career behind bars will make his faith disappear.