Whisting to tease a woman triggered a criminal case. A man in Ankang was beaten and died after treatment failed. What do you think?

Whistling to tease a woman triggered a criminal case, and a man in Ankang died after being beaten and unable to receive medical treatment. My opinion is that before the incident, Zhang was whistling to tease him, but Zhang ignored him and drove away with his friends. Unexpectedly, when they met others at the intersection, they whistled and made noises with Yang. Liu, who was riding with Zhang, couldn't bear it and insulted them. If the matter ends here, legally, neither party will be found to have broken the law.

He Yang teased Zhang with whistles. From their subjective point of view, this was of course a hooligan behavior in order to seek some kind of mental stimulation, but it did not cause much harm after all. If Zhang calls the police, others may only receive criticism and education and will not be held accountable for other legal responsibilities.

Of course, it must be pointed out that the behavior of Chen and others may be civilly considered sexual harassment, and they need to bear civil tort liability. But things didn't end with Liu's counterattack. Instead, it aroused the "fighting spirit" of Chen and others. They began to chase and intercept the vehicle driven by Zhang several times, eventually forcing Zhang to stop on a certain road section.

After that, the others forced Zhang and others to get out of the car, and a dispute broke out between the two parties. Yang then punched Zhang in the face, causing the two sides to fight. Chen suffered a head injury and died after ineffective treatment.

As a result, the provocative behavior of Chen and others escalated step by step, from whistling and teasing at the beginning to chasing, intercepting vehicles, and driving into people. The incident was triggered by the provocative behavior of Zhang, who then chased and intercepted Zhang's vehicle. This behavior is very harmful. He is also suspected of dangerous driving and picking quarrels and provoking trouble. However, due to the heavier sentencing for the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles, according to the principle of handling imaginary concurrence crimes, the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles should be punished.

Regarding the death of , why did Zhang and others not take criminal coercive measures for intentional homicide or negligent death? In general, Zhang and others subjectively did not have the intention to kill because they were teased, chased, and intercepted. Therefore, the suspicion of intentional homicide can almost be ruled out. As for the crime of intentional injury and the crime of negligent death, it is necessary to restore the situation at the time of the incident and comprehensively consider the location, intensity and frequency of Chen's attacks before we can draw the correct conclusion.