Sexual assault by lobules after drunkenness.
On the evening of May 22nd, 2065438+03, Feng Li told reporters about the past that he had been reluctant to mention. Feng Li said that on February 2, 2065438, her defense lawyer and Peng met, and Zhao Hongxia told the lawyer that Xiaoye had forced her to have sex.
"On September 16, 2007 (the sixth day of the eighth lunar month), Zhao Hongxia celebrated his birthday." Feng Li said that Zhao Hongxia had received Xiao Ye's invitation to attend a dinner party. "Zhao Hongxia drank some beer at dinner, but he didn't drink much," Feng Li said. After that, Zhao Hongxia began to feel dizzy and "groggy" and was carried to a hotel room by several people. "The next day, Zhao Hongxia saw it at Moon Friends Hotel," Feng Li said.
According to what the lawyer told Feng Li, Xiaoye entered the room at midnight that day. Zhao Hongxia "woke up at the sound of opening the door". Then, Xiao Ye went to bed and began to take off Zhao Hongxia's clothes. "Her skirt was ripped off by Xiao Ye," said Li Feng. Zhao Hongxia struggled desperately. In the process of resistance, Zhao Hongxia felt head swelling, pain and other discomfort, which gradually weakened her resistance. Xiaoye also took the opportunity to have sex with her forcibly.
Feng Li told reporters that the next day, Xiao Ye promised Zhao Hongxia that he would be responsible for his actions. Xiaoye also promised to stay with Zhao Hongxia and let her live a better life. After that, Xiaoye said that he would go to the company to deal with things and left the hotel, while Zhao Hongxia asked the front desk for a needle and thread, sewed the buttons and left the hotel.
"Xiaoye's words made her very confused. She was also afraid that if this matter was known by others, it would affect her life, so she didn't go to the Public Security Bureau to report the case." Feng Li said with a sigh that his wife is too trusting.
Xiaoye's former employee admitted to drugging the wine.
"She was drugged," Feng Li told reporters. He once told Zhang and Peng, two defense lawyers, that Xu Yang (a pseudonym), a former employee of the company, had admitted the matter in front of her and (a pseudonym, one of the indecent video shooters).
On February 20 13, Feng Li found Deng Li to verify this matter. Deng Li told him on the phone that in 2009, after she left the company with Xu Yang and Zhao Hongxia, they had a private conversation. In this conversation, Idy told Zhao Hongxia that the beer handed to her at that time was drugged.
In addition, Deng Li also told Feng Li that she learned from Xu Yang that besides Zhao Hongxia, many women in Xiao Ye Company were sexually assaulted by drugs. According to the reporter's relevant clues, Guo, who worked in Xiaoye's Hualunda Clothing Co., Ltd. at that time, also said that there were not a few women who had the same experience in the company at that time. Among the women who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Xiaoye, Hu (a pseudonym, another indecent video shooter) bluntly said that people like Xiaoye wouldn't even look at it when they walked down the street. How could they have a relationship with him?
Li Feng said that he hoped that defense lawyers and Xiang Peng public security organs would report the case. In this regard, Feng Li expressed his support and told all the information he had learned to the two lawyers. Soon, he Peng drafted a criminal indictment and reported it to the Chongqing public security organ.
The complaint was dismissed because of insufficient evidence.
On March 8, 20 13, Feng Li learned from his lawyer Zhang Zhiyong that he didn't want to accept the news: the public security organ refused to file a case on the grounds of "insufficient evidence".
For this result, Zhao Hongxia, who was still being held in the detention center at that time, and Li Feng, who was at home, both told lawyers that they had to appeal to the public security organs again. According to the blog record of Zhang Zhiyong, the defense lawyer, at the meeting on April 2, 20 13, Zhao Hongxia expressed his determination to prosecute and appeal to the end and exhaust all legal means to investigate the criminal responsibility of the defendant.
To this end, He Peng subsequently filed an application for reconsideration with the public security organ. On April 20 13 10, the Chongqing public security organ rejected the application for reconsideration on the grounds of "insufficient evidence".
Feng Li has made up his mind to "sue to the end", Feng Li said, because it is a fact that his wife has been hurt. At the same time, he also called on girls who had been sexually assaulted by Xiaoye to unite and "let Xiaoye be punished by law".
On June 28th, the People's Court of Yubei District, Chongqing first sentenced six people, including Xiaoye, to extortion. Xiao Ye, the principal offender, was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 10 year, Xu Sheqing was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 4 years and was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months. The defendant, Tan and Wang Jianjun were sentenced to probation according to their respective criminal circumstances, and they were able to truthfully confess the main crimes after the case and showed repentance. After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, Xiao Ye, Xu Sheqing and Yan Peng appealed.
On September 5, 20 13, Chongqing No.1 Intermediate People's Court conducted the second trial of this case. Xiao Ye, Xu Sheqing and Yan Peng pleaded guilty in court and asked the court for a lighter sentence. On September 20 13 9 17, the court pronounced the case, and the presiding judge evaluated the opinions put forward by the three appellants one by one.
In response to the opinion of Xiao Ye and his defenders that Xiao Ye surrendered himself, the court held that before the verdict was pronounced in the first instance of this case, Xiao Ye did not truthfully confess the fact that he extorted money in the name of "borrowing", and denied the criminal acts of threatening, extorting others and extorting money by using the indecent video he shot, so it could not be considered as surrender.
In addition, in response to Xiao Ye's request for a lighter punishment, the court comprehensively considered Xiao Ye's subjective malignancy, the social impact of the case and the degree of harm, and believed that Xiao Ye confessed to his main criminal facts in the trial of second instance, which was not enough to give him a lighter punishment. There is nothing wrong with the original judgment and sentencing, and the reasons for appeal and defense opinions are not established.
In the verdict of the day, Tan and Wang Jianjun, who did not appeal, appeared in court as accomplices to hear the verdict of the second instance.