An anonymous person killed by a Shandong man in a traffic accident cannot be compensated for a reduced sentence. What is the noteworthy information in the case?

The perpetrator is a truck driver, who travels around all the year round and runs long-distance freight. This traffic accident happened on the 20th 19 1 1 month19. The driver drove from Qihe, Shandong Province to Zhangqiu Power Plant to transport coal. As a truck driver, it is common to burn the midnight oil. According to the memories of the perpetrators, it was raining lightly on the day of the traffic accident. It was early in the morning and there were not many cars on the road at night. However, as an experienced truck driver, the perpetrators still control not to drive too fast and drive carefully at night. However, due to the limited vision of large trucks, the vision on both sides is incomplete. When driving to a village entrance, I vaguely felt the car hit an object and saw a black object flash in front of me. The driver thought that he had been driving for too long and had hallucinations, so he didn't think so. He continued to drive on the road. When he reacted, it seemed that he had really hit something and called the police. Only then did he know that he had really hit someone and that that person was dead.

? Because the driver left the scene without reacting after hitting someone, he was criminally detained for committing traffic accidents. After the traffic accident, the perpetrator can negotiate compensation with the victim's family, but because the deceased is an old scavenger, he has no relatives and no relatives to negotiate with, so he can't fight for a reduced sentence. However, it is worth noting that the accident site is at the entrance of a village, which is an accident-prone area, and there are no warning signs on the roadside. If the driver doesn't concentrate on driving, it is easy to have a traffic accident.

After searching by various departments, it is still impossible to find the families of the old scavengers. Soon after, the court made public the first-instance judgment and sentenced the driver to three years and six months in prison. It is worth noting that the driver was unable to obtain a letter of understanding from his family, nor could he find anyone or department to accept his compensation. The driver consulted a number of departments, and the departments shirked each other, and they could not find a solution and could not fight for commutation.

Therefore, it is worth noting that there is no warning sign at the entrance of the village, and all departments shirk their responsibilities. Although the perpetrators sincerely pleaded guilty and voluntarily promised compensation, they could not get a reduced sentence because they could not find the families of the old scavengers.