I am angry, but I still have to take responsibility. The brief introduction of the case was introduced by Ding Mou, Angelababy Township, zhenping county, Henan Province, and Zhao Mou, Niuchong Village, Wolong District, Nanyang City. 20 12 After the Spring Festival, the couple held a wedding in accordance with rural customs without going through the marriage registration. On June 20 14, Zhao met another young man, Jian Huang, while working in Shenzhen. Later, Zhao and Ding had a family conflict, so Zhao ran away from home and was never heard from again. Later, Ding went to Zhao's maiden twice and never saw Zhao. On the fourth day of the first month of the Spring Festival in 20 15, Ding Mou, his mother, uncle, menstruation, cousin and others, accompanied by the matchmaker, went to Zhao's house to discuss marriage. In Zhaojiatang's house, there was a fierce quarrel between the two sides, and Zhao's mother Mao Xzhi suddenly fainted when she left the house and walked into the yard. The family rushed to the hospital for treatment and was diagnosed with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. After 27 days, Zhao's mother passed away. Zhao's family believes that Ding, as a son-in-law, should know that her mother-in-law has high blood pressure, and Dante and his relatives made trouble at home more than once, which eventually led to the tragedy. So Zhao's family reported to the public security organ and accused Ding and his relatives of intentional injury. However, the police found out that there was no physical conflict between the two sides during the quarrel and finally decided not to file a case. So Zhao's family sued Ding and Ding's relatives to the Wolong District Court in Nanyang City, demanding that the court order the six defendants to jointly compensate 343,448.28 yuan, and publicly apologize to Zhao's family. The six defendants believed that they did not commit any infringement on the deceased, because Mao himself died of illness, and the consequences of his death had no causal relationship with their quarrel, and they did not agree to compensation. The results of the trial The People's Court of Wolong District of Nanyang City held that Ding and his relatives went to Zhao's house to talk about marriage in order to resolve conflicts. During the negotiation, the two sides quarreled, which is a common phenomenon in the negotiation process. But Zhao's mother suddenly fainted in the quarrel and died after being rescued by the hospital. The result was unexpected by both sides. Although it is not certain which side is at fault, Zhao's mother did get sick during the quarrel between the two sides. There is no necessary causal relationship between the quarrel between the two sides and Zhao's mother's final death, but there are certain incentives. According to Article 24 of the Tort Liability Law, if the victim and the actor are not at fault for the occurrence of the damage, they can share the loss according to the actual situation. Accordingly, the court finally ruled that the six defendants compensated the plaintiff for economic losses of 50,000 yuan. Related knowledge: Is it criminal responsibility to make people angry? 1, "irritating people" is not murder, and of course it does not bear the responsibility for murder, but it does not necessarily mean that it does not bear legal responsibility. If you "annoy people" in the form of insult and slander, you will definitely bear criminal responsibility. 2. If it is intentional, just like Zhuge Liang's three weeks-Zhou Yu, he learned his shortcomings, not killing people, but letting him die in this way to achieve the goal of destroying him. This is physical abuse and mental destruction. There is a crime of abuse in criminal law, and those who cause serious consequences should bear certain responsibilities. Note: The Civil Code comes into effect as of 20211. Marriage Law, Inheritance Law, General Principles of Civil Law, Adoption Law, Guarantee Law, Contract Law, Property Law, Tort Liability Law and General Principles of Civil Law shall be abolished at the same time. Article 186 If neither the victim nor the actor is at fault for the occurrence of the damage, both parties shall share the loss according to law. The above is the relevant knowledge of "making people angry without paying the price of their lives". I hope everyone knows more about it. If your legitimate rights and interests are violated in the future, you can safeguard your legitimate rights and interests through legal weapons. If your situation is complicated, online lawyer consultation service is also provided. You are welcome to have legal consultation.
Legal objectivity:
Article 179 of the Civil Law stipulates that anyone who infringes upon others and causes personal injury shall pay compensation for medical expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, nutrition expenses, hospital food subsidies and other reasonable expenses for treatment and rehabilitation, as well as the income reduced due to absenteeism. If it causes disability, it shall also compensate for the cost of assistive devices and disability compensation; If death is caused, funeral expenses and death compensation shall also be paid.