1. Falsifying the name of others and forging relevant litigation evidence materials.
On September 20 19 17, the Penalty Decision of Yunnan Lawyers Association was delivered. Just ten days ago, the Disciplinary (Reward and Punishment) Committee of Yunnan Lawyers Association held a meeting, and found that Gan, using the name of others and forging relevant litigation evidence materials violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 34 of the Disciplinary Rules for Members of all china lawyers association (Trial). The meeting decided to cancel the membership of lawyers Li Wang and Wang Longde, and suggested that judicial administrative organs revoke their lawyer's practice certificates according to law.
Two. Publish remarks that endanger national security
On September 6th, the Justice Department of Shandong Province delivered the Notice of the Parties' Hearing Rights in Administrative Punishment Cases of Judicial Administrative Organs to Shandong lawyer Zhu. The Justice Department of Shandong Province intends to impose administrative punishment on him for his speech endangering national security.
Third, stealing other people's property many times.
Client Meng Desheng, lawyer of Shaanxi Ye Jing Law Firm. From March 2006 to April 2006, stealing other people's property for many times has constituted theft. On August 22nd, 20 16, he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment and fined 10000 yuan by Hantai District People's Court of Hanzhong City. Due to intentional crime, Shaanxi Provincial Department of Justice revoked his practice certificate.
Fourth, the fraud case of "no active informant"
2065438+On July 24th, 2007, the administrative penalty decision of Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice was delivered to Lin Xia. Lin Xia was punished for intentional crime and his lawyer's practice certificate was revoked. However, this is nothing compared with Lin Xia's punishment.
Lin Xia's case is controversial in the legal field. His defense lawyer called this a fraud case with "no active informant". Of the four "victims" listed in the indictment, two have clearly submitted written statements to the court, confirming that there is only a private loan relationship between Lin Xia and them, and there is no fraud. The remaining two "victims" are corporate loans, one of which is guaranteed by contract, and the other has filed a civil lawsuit with the court after Lin Xia was kidnapped, with the aim of preserving the creditor's rights.