Legal analysis: The procedure for review of judicial appraisal applications: first, after the appraisal committee accepts the case, it is handed over to a group of experts in relevant professions for appraisal; second, the appraisal results of the expert group are issued in the name of the appraisal committee The document must be signed by the experts participating in the appraisal and stamped with the appraisal seal of the appraisal committee; third, the appraisal conclusion of the appraisal committee, like other appraisal conclusions, has no binding force on the adjudicating authority.
Legal basis: "Regulations on the Procedures for Public Security Organs to Handle Criminal Reconsideration and Review Cases"
Article 6: During the process of handling criminal cases, the following relevant persons may, in accordance with the law, lodge a complaint with the public security organ that made the decision: Application for criminal reconsideration:
(1) If the party concerned is dissatisfied with the decision to withdraw the application, the party and its legal representative, litigation agent, and defender may submit an application
(2) To challenge the decision to confiscate the security deposit If the guarantor is dissatisfied with the decision on the fine, he or she may raise the issue himself;
(4) If the guarantor is dissatisfied with the fine decision, he or she may raise the issue; If the accuser is dissatisfied with the decision, the accuser may file a complaint;
(5) The administrative agency that transferred the case is dissatisfied with the decision not to file the case
Seven. Article 7 If an applicant for criminal reconsideration is dissatisfied with the criminal reconsideration decision made by the public security organ in items 2 to 4 of Article 6 of these Regulations, he may apply for criminal reconsideration to the public security organ at the next higher level.