There are many similarities between your accident and mine, so it is difficult for me to make an appraisal. The other party is an electric car (the new traffic law stipulates to protect the weak, so we are all motor vehicles, and everyone else is an electric car, so it must be the weak, and the amount of compensation in the end is also quite large, which can take advantage of the law. After all, the law is imperfect and many systems are still contradictory. I want to remind you that if the other party is not a staff member of a state enterprise or institution, what he said is a mistake. Not counting legal income can only be considered as a suggestion, so it depends on the situation. He will definitely say that a lot of money is just for blackmail. If it does, the amount he proposed will be a bubble. Does he have proof? Can you prove your monthly salary? Is it legal? Is it stamped by the state? Therefore, he is not a state-owned enterprise. These are all good for you. In the end, his decision was basically the same. Once he is tried, it's almost settled. If he thinks it is necessary, let him sue at the next higher level. In the end, he may not get the prosecution fee back.
Tell me what you said.
1, identification is not good for you, and there is no way to change the result caused by any relationship. As for the responsibility, the general traffic police judge fairly (unless they collect money or have personal relationships), and generally protect the weak, but you don't have insurance, which is not good for you. As for how much responsibility is fair, it depends on how much you can bear. If it is too small, it can't be estimated. After all, yours is a motor vehicle. Moreover, it is also identified that there is a problem with the rear brakes and it is an unqualified vehicle. In fact, a bare unqualified vehicle can already give you more responsibility (if the accident is serious, it is not impossible to investigate your criminal responsibility)
As for the speed of an electric car, it is a non-motor vehicle, that is to say, it is equivalent to a bicycle. I'm too fast. It's none of your business. You should make sure that the contact point between your car and his car is whether you collided head-on or side-on. The story here is very different. What's more, I didn't understand what you described. How did he turn right and run into your driveway? Or in the non-motor vehicle lane (if you are in the non-motor vehicle lane, you have violated the law), did he pass in the same direction as you or in the opposite direction? Now that you say he has surpassed you, you are in the same direction. Since he turned right in the same direction, how could he meet you? As we all know, the non-motor vehicle lane, the right side of the motor vehicle lane, turn right, how can he pass your lane? Are you at the intersection or on the straight?
First of all, you have no insurance, which is not good for you. I won't go into details. It's simple. Just pay for it. He asked for double insurance. Of course, if you are willing to lie to him and help him with insurance, it is ok, but is it good for you? Can he make you pay less if you help him with insurance? If you apply for insurance, you don't want to be asked. If you don't want to help him with insurance, as long as he asks you for money, you can leave the original and come by yourself. When he doesn't have it, he can't ask for any more money. As long as the insurance is original and legal, it is best to find a lawyer. After all, we are not law majors. We don't know which ones can be reimbursed and which ones can't. The simplest thing is that I had an accident before. Later, when she went to court, everything she took was illegal, and she forged it herself. My lawyer found it in the details and was finally rejected. My personal opinion is that you should find a lawyer. Not only that, you should let him handle this matter with you. Lawyer's fee is not much. If you lose money, it will be a big number. You said that ordinary people only save a few 10W in their lifetime. What he took was not recognized by the relevant national laws. Even a fool can imagine that if he had some diseases before and happened to have an operation in this accident, who would reimburse him for that pile of nonsense? It depends on whether his operation has anything to do with your accident. There are really many people touching porcelain now. If so, you can sue, so that everyone is fair. First of all, people who touch porcelain are afraid because he is illegal. Even if he succeeds every time, no one is stupid. Why does he always lose money when he has an accident every day? There is also a judgment, as long as the evidence, the so-called evidence, is authenticity and legality, and whether the amount of compensation he wants is within the scope prescribed by law. If you kill him, he will have to open his mouth 10W. There is nothing to understand, minor injuries or ordinary injuries. That's too much. He may not be able to take advantage of the lawsuit. If you hire a lawyer, you'd better not find a big-name lawyer or a lawyer who handles criminal cases. If you can't do such a case well, you'd better find a civil lawsuit at home. I believe there must be a law firm nearby, usually retired old judges and some other veterans. They have been trying or handling such cases all their lives. It's as simple as eating a meal. My previous accident was still different from yours. The main thing is that I have insurance and you don't, so he caught you by the skin.
Tell me more about the prosecution. Personally, it's better to sue first. It depends. It doesn't matter if he is related to you in the same city and district/county. However, if it's not a county, you should sue first. If he sues first, he will certainly sue near their home. What do you think is cheaper to go to other people's territory? At least this is your home, and he's not here. Under fair conditions (both sides don't look for acquaintances), the judge won't judge him to win, but you'd better mobilize the whole family or friends to find acquaintances and grasp the bigger point. what do you think? You went to another county, and when you got there, no one knew him. How many chances do you think you have? When this time comes, it usually has nothing to do with the traffic police. However, the accident liability certificate made by the traffic police is also valid in the office. At present, you should divide the responsibilities first, which will help you to go to court in the future. It suddenly occurred to me that your car was still detained or mentioned. If you detain it and want to take it out, you can pay a deposit if the other party disagrees. This deposit. The reason is that I'm afraid I can't find your people, so I left a deposit. In the end, as long as you don't run away, the money will still be given to you and won't fall into the other hand. Now this society, it doesn't matter, it's hard to do anything. Even the tickets in line have TM dealers. It seems that money is still working.
Good luck. I hope my advice can help you.