Regarding the list of questions written by lawyers, is there an example provided?

Of course if for lawyers I think the most rigorous or according to the censorship system, set up on their own.

Public Prosecutor's case checklist

A. Receiving the case:

1, formalities related to the paperwork is complete?

2. Do the items received correspond to the return of service?

3, stolen money and goods should be properly preserved?

II. Initial reading of the file

4. Are the facts clear enough?

5, whether the suspect confessed to the crime?

6. Does the suspect have a disease, especially a contagious one?

3. Arraignment

7. What day should the arraignment take place?

8. Do I have all these circumstances in mind?

9. Are these the only things? Are these the only people?

Four, review the evidence

10, the evidence can form a complete chain?

11, some links are isolated evidence or too weak?

12, how to deal with the testimony of tainted witnesses?

13. To what extent is circumstantial and indirect evidence illustrative?

13. To what extent are circumstantial and indirect evidence illustrative?

14. Can discrepancies in the details of the testimony be reasonably explained?

15, can some scribbles and low-level errors in the transcript be reasonably and exclusively explained?

V. APPLICABLE LAW

16. Whether it constitutes a crime and what kind of crime?

17. Has every subversive situation been captured?

18, What are the statutory circumstances?

VI. Prosecution

19. Is the prosecution appropriate?

20. Are there any typos in the indictment?

21, how many copies of evidence is appropriate (which evidence is considered primary evidence)?

VII. Appearance in court and after

22. Does the other side have a defense lawyer?

23, the court is well prepared?

24, received the judgment within the legal deadline?

25, is the court's judgment correct?