I feel that in my family's lawsuit, both the director and the lawyer speak for the plaintiff. Did the plaintiff buy it?

In this case, I think you may be suspicious. You are not a professional legal person, so there is a certain angle problem in judging your case. The judge tried the case from a neutral point of view, and the evidence provided by the plaintiff was enough to prove his claim. You have been sticking to your own ideas, so the judge must explain to you what the evidence provided by the plaintiff is and what the real situation is. So do lawyers. Although they are your agents, they should also analyze this matter fairly within the scope of the law, instead of blindly following your thoughts. The lawyer will introduce you to the whole case, which will inevitably involve the plaintiff's evidence and remind you of the risks. Therefore, I think, in this case, you have such an illusion. It is possible that your case is very bad for you, not to buy it. Judges should try according to law, lawyers should represent them according to law, and they will not do anything illegal. I suggest that if you can mediate with the other party as soon as possible, it will reduce your loss. Trust the law, the judge and your lawyer.