Can the general principles of criminal law be used as the basis for judging a case? If so, is there any actual judgment to prove it? Thank you~

It should be used as the basis for judging the case. For example, the provisions on attempted crime, preparation for crime, suspension of crime, etc. Provisions on heavier punishment for repeat offenders, etc.

Example: The Civil Judgment Attached to Criminal Cases of Shangqiu Intermediate People's Court of Henan Province

(29) The commercial punishment is preliminary. 14

The public prosecution organ is the People's Procuratorate of Shangqiu City, Henan Province.

plaintiff yin yixing, male, was born on February 3th, 1964+65438. It is the father of the victim Yin Erx.

Plaintiff Huang Yixx, female, was born on August 5, 1964. It's the mother of the victim Yin Erx.

Defendant Zhang XX, male, was born in April 1978.

the people's procuratorate of Shangqiu city, Henan province accused the defendant Zhang XX of intentional injury with indictment No.6 of (29) Commercial Criminal Chu Zi, and filed a public prosecution with our hospital on March 11th, 29. In the course of litigation, plaintiffs Yin Mou xx and Huang Mou xx in incidental civil litigation filed incidental civil litigation with our hospital according to law. Our hospital formed a collegiate bench according to law and held a public hearing on April 1, 29 to jointly hear the case. Shangqiu Municipal People's Procuratorate appointed prosecutors to appear in court to support public prosecution, and plaintiffs Yin Yixxx and Huang Yixxx, their agents ad litem, defendant Zhang and their defenders attended the proceedings. The case has now been closed.

We believe that the defendant Zhang intentionally injured others with a knife and caused death, and his behavior has constituted the crime of intentional injury (death). The charges charged by the public prosecution agency were established. The defendant Zhang's crime was bad in nature and had serious consequences. He should be given a heavier punishment according to law, but since he is a person with limited criminal responsibility, he can be given a lighter punishment according to law. The plaintiffs in the incidental civil action, Yin Mou xx and Huang Mou xx, demanded compensation for funeral expenses of 1,467.5 yuan, treatment expenses of 1,27.94 yuan and * * * 165.44 yuan, which should be supported according to law, while other claims were unfounded in law, and our court refused to support them. According to the provisions of Article 234, paragraph 2, Article 18, paragraph 3, Article 36 and Article 57 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 119 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the verdict is as follows:

1. Defendant Zhang was convicted of intentional injury, sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life;

2. Defendant Zhang compensated plaintiffs X and X for economic losses of 11,675.44 yuan.

if you are not satisfied with this judgment, you can appeal to the Higher People's Court of Henan Province through our court or directly within ten days from the second day of receiving the judgment. A written appeal shall be submitted in one original and four copies.