After reading the description of the subject, I was a little lucky. Here you can clearly tell the questioner that it is impossible to be completely fine!
Whether it is a misdemeanor such as the crime of aiding trust, or a crime such as fraud, which has been severely punished in recent years, surrender and active cooperation are not the only reasons for the judicial authorities to let you go!
For example, surrender and active cooperation do have an impact on punishment, but the legal provisions are not specific. For example, 1% and 39% of the lighter base sentences are both lighter, and it depends on the judicial authorities to consider other factors.
Also, subjects must not think that they are complacent after being detained for only five days. The arrest rate for the crime of aiding trust is not high, but many people are actually sentenced after being released on bail pending trial. Here is a case for your reference:
After being released on bail pending trial, the client in this case was eventually sentenced to two years and three months in prison.
Like the client, the turnover is 2 million and the profit is 8,000. In practice, many are sentenced. The subject should feel fortunate that he was convicted of the crime of facilitating trust, rather than the crime of fraud or an upstream accomplice.
Of course, this does not mean that the subject must be sentenced to an actual sentence, but it depends on factors such as whether the party has participated in specific transfers, the relationship with the upstream, the number of upstream criminals who were helped, and the region.
It is not impossible to seek a suspended sentence. After all, the client has relatively minor circumstances, and at least the client is correct in his attitude of pleading guilty. If conditions permit, it is best to understand your own situation, find effective defense points, and communicate with the prosecutor based on lighter circumstances. As long as there is good evidence, it is not impossible for the prosecutor to adopt the opinion and impose a penalty.
However, prosecutors will take the initiative to avoid suspicion, and it is difficult for ordinary people without legal knowledge to find defense points. In this case, you can consider entrusting a criminal defense lawyer who is good at handling this case and good at communication to intervene in the case and help the client.
After all, because such a lawyer is good at such cases, the details must be easy to obtain. In terms of communication, the subject does not need to worry that lawyers who are not good at communication will not be able to grasp the key points for a long time.