1, handle identity-related disputes. Such as marriage, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. ;
2. Handle contract dispute cases. Disputes include the confirmation of the validity of various contracts, compensation for breach of contract, cancellation, etc.
3. Handling cases of infringement disputes. Including medical accidents, traffic accidents, product quality liability, personal injury compensation, environmental pollution infringement and other infringement cases;
4. Handling labor dispute cases. Including labor contract disputes, disputes caused by layoffs of employers, disputes caused by economic compensation and compensation, disputes caused by layoffs of employers, etc.
5. Handling intellectual property disputes. Including disputes in the fields of copyright, trademark rights and patent rights;
6. Deal with property disputes. Including disputes in the fields of ownership, usufructuary right and security right;
7. Handle disputes related to the company. Including shareholder qualification confirmation, equity transfer, shareholder contribution, company merger and division.
The business process of civil and commercial lawyers is as follows:
1, receiving case data;
2, a preliminary understanding of the case;
3. Determine customer needs;
4. Law/case retrieval;
5. Analyze the case;
6. Publish the quotation;
7. Go through the entrustment procedures;
8. Create a file.
To sum up, in the above-mentioned numerous disputes in the civil and commercial fields, civil and commercial lawyers can be entrusted to conduct civil and commercial litigation, draft legal documents, investigate and collect evidence materials, issue various legal opinions, participate in trial and mediation on their behalf, and handle non-litigation cases on their behalf, so as to maximize the legitimate interests of the parties in the simplest way.
Legal basis:
Article 1 of Guiding Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Civil and Commercial Contract Dispute Cases under the Current Situation
It is clearly stipulated that the court should reasonably allocate the burden of proof when determining the loss of available interests. Generally, the breaching party should bear the burden of proof to prove that the observant party failed to take reasonable measures to reduce losses, and the observant party benefited from the breach of contract, and the observant party was also at fault; The non-breaching party shall bear the burden of proof for all losses of available benefits and necessary transaction costs. For foreseeable losses, both the non-breaching party can provide evidence and the people's court can handle them as appropriate according to the specific circumstances.