For example, why does a patient go to the hospital for treatment after being diagnosed with cancer? The general principle is the same, that is, to die with "self-esteem", to ensure the right of defense, to reduce crimes and crimes that are not illegal, to ensure and embody basic civil rights in a fair and just procedure. In fact, many things are a whole process, and the whole process is usually more critical than the result. Including life is actually a complete process. Only by ensuring the fairness of the program flow first can the fairness of the physical circuit be guaranteed. Belated justice. It's not fair.
Professional Ethics Some criminal defense lawyers do lack professional ethics, but a large number of lawyers have their own social ethics and moral bottom line. Defend the suspect because: 1. Whether a criminal suspect is a murderer or not, first of all, as a person, he has the right to defense in laws and regulations. Defending criminal suspects is to better reduce the occurrence of unjust, false and misjudged cases. 2. Defending the suspect, you can also grasp the motive of the suspect and why he committed the crime. Laws and regulations are gradually improved in social and economic development, and cruel things should be stopped at the source, not by killing.
Lawyers came into being gradually in the 1980s (there were lawyers in the early days of liberation), which was necessary to protect human rights. Criminals must have lawyers to defend them, otherwise the verdict will be unfair! Defending criminals is naturally not defending their crimes and punishments, but just defending their legal rights. For example, the murderer, the prosecutor accused two people of murder, and the criminal only admitted that he actually killed one person, so the lawyer needs to find direct evidence to defend. For example, if it is mental illness, lawyers need to find direct evidence that is beneficial to criminals, but it must be true! No makeup is allowed. If what the public prosecutor said is basically sworn enemies, then there is really nothing to defend, which can only show that the defendant has surrendered himself to justice.
In our country, if you did commit a crime, the other party has no direct evidence, but you told the lawyer the objective facts of your crime. This lawyer has the right to keep your secret. Let you plead not guilty. Lawyers and other individuals act reasonably and legally. But suppose you have planned the murder and informed the lawyer. Lawyers must report to the police station. If you don't report it, it's against the rules.
The initial intention of establishing lawyer rules and regulations is good, and most lawyers are also responsible for the defendant, but some lawyers lack the bottom line of being a man and know that they can't do it! Incite the defendant to sue a lawyer and get money from it. There is an ancient saying: no lawsuit! But if the world moves, you will ask a lawyer to go to court. Please think it over. Is there a big winner in asking a lawyer to file a lawsuit? Take the debt dispute as an example. If the dispute of pre-tender estimate100000 wins immediately, how much will it cost to get it back? But also get a sum of capital investment, some are unable to repay their work, and they can't take a penny home! Anyone who has played other miscellaneous disputes knows! The borrower had better wait for him to have money within the grace period, and may pay more. You have to give it to your friends!
Just like Dr. Zhao, you just need to pay and help you recover as much as possible. Late lung cancer can also be treated by a doctor to relieve the pain. Lawyers, too, should fight for disputes that they can't win and try their best. Death mitigation The essence of death penalty is death. It is very likely that there will be a way out of prison, which used to be more common. The presiding judge is also a human being, and the restrictions can be subjective. Secondly, the country's presiding judge and lawyer, hehe, reached an agreement without saying a word, and the money was divided together, hehe. In some disputes, lawyers can also be regarded as intermediary companies.
A lawyer is a very good post, but don't cheat except to keep energetic in the post. At least be a person with a bottom line and a standard post. It is also the same position as farmers' farming. They also have operational norms, and they can grow the same grain in the same season, but not out of season. He is not allowed to make mistakes under normal circumstances. If you make a mistake for a year, you will lose anything.
Lawyers are a special pearl in social development, and the relationship between criminals and lawyers is also a kind of labor relationship. Under all normal circumstances (that is, there is no need to cheat), the criminal has hired a lawyer, who will defend the criminal's innocence at the trial, regardless of whether the criminal is right or wrong. Since he is employed by criminals (naturally, this includes money and credibility, which is what a lawyer needs), he should do his duty for criminals.
Many people have commented that a criminal is guilty of a heinous crime, so why should a lawyer defend him? They even say that lawyers have no conscience, morality and sense of justice. This statement is illogical. Since it is an employment relationship, employees have to do their best, otherwise lawyers have no conscience and morality. Gu Yan: if you have money, you must eliminate disasters for others! Tell a true case: There was once a woman whose husband died of illness. She was still very young and wanted to remarry, but her husband's family strongly opposed it. This is not unusual now, but the old traditional ideas in the past did not allow it. ) Because of this, the woman invited a famous lawyer at that time. The lawyer thought about it and wrote a complaint: in the story of Diusim, my concubine has no beauty, and my father has Dong Zhuo. The woman was asked to give it to the judge, who read it and gave it to her husband, who was angry and anxious and said, let her get married.
Entrusted by people, the lawyer's duty is to help clients fight for benefits or avoid losses. Legal facts are not the facts that the parties think subjectively, but the facts proved by the evidence chain, and the excavation, collation and interpretation of relevant evidence is a job that ordinary people can't do in a short time. As for the lawyer's insistence on fairness and justice, it is achieved through the debate between the original defendant and the defendant's lawyer in the judicial system, not a single lawyer. There are several possibilities for you to think that the trial result is unfair: the judge bends the law (the appeal can be corrected, unless the whole justice is black), the lawyer who feels unfair is not competent or inaction, and his own evidence chain is missing. As for those lawyers who are doomed to lose, many of them are not for winning in the usual sense, but for not losing more. For example, the lion filed a claim 1 100 million, and finally paid 90 million. If the injured party demands the death penalty and is finally sentenced to imprisonment, can you say it is the defendant's loss?
In current criminal cases, lawyers generally plead guilty and do not win or lose. Prisoners' families are not allowed to meet while in the detention center. However, lawyers have the right to meet and can provide some psychological comfort to their families. Even some lawyers don't even read the file from beginning to end, and directly plead guilty and admit punishment. If the facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is conclusive, no matter how powerful the lawyer is, it is useless.
It has nothing to do with morality. In the past, China's conviction was based on the assumption that a person was guilty, and then looking for evidence to clear the suspect. Now it's a verdict of not guilty. Before sentencing, everyone is innocent, and the public prosecution agency collects evidence. Many times, public opinion tends to be biased. Who do you think is guilty? However, due to the asymmetry of information, you may not have a comprehensive understanding. Under the premise of guilty verdict, misjudged cases are more likely to occur, which will have a worse social impact, because not only good people are wronged, but also bad people are at large. But on the premise of innocence, even if the evidence is insufficient, the bad guys will not be sentenced. The result is that the bad guys are at large, and it's over.
The degree of civilization of the rule of law in a society depends on the public's tolerance for lawyers to defend criminals who are despised by everyone. Criminals face the national public security law. In front of the state violence organs, it is as easy to crush an individual criminal as to crush an ant. The appearance of lawyers is to ensure the realization of criminal human rights, look for all evidence that is beneficial to criminals, and criticize the application of laws and regulations and procedural supervision by public security organs, so as to improve the level of social rule of law and improve laws.