How do defense lawyers defend instructors who charge candidates for driving benefits?

The lawyer said it was inertial operation. That is to say, in this exam of the third subject, many people charge intermediary fees in this way, so this kind of fund rebate is also an inertial operation, so this defense lawyer said so, but the court held that this was inconsistent with the basic facts, so the person who revoked the deduction in the first instance was sentenced to four years in prison, so we still have to face this matter correctly.

First, why is this happening? Or first of all, I think that if such a phenomenon occurs, it must be related to such a system, and if it is related to family education itself, then for some people, subject 2 and subject 3 are operated on the spot, so such an operation may be difficult, so some people, after all, are human society, so she will pay bribes. If such a coach is like this, then I think it is natural and has a certain influence, so I still have such an inertial thinking after the interests, so we really should resist such a thing and let such bad behavior disappear. This is also the wish of the driving test driver.

Second, we have some feelings about this phenomenon. Well, first of all, in such a society, I think we sympathize with the appearance of such an image, because it is for a driver's license. If we get this certificate, we can drive, so I think this is a very good thing in itself. But in this kind of training, because some people are opportunistic, such behavior, and then this behavior becomes less noble, so I think it is still very good. Yes, this is indeed a judgment, so I think the court is fair, just and reasonable.