The reason for this is the following:
Article 9 of the Opinions on Equal Protection and Healthy Development of Non-public Economy issued by the Supreme People's Court on February 29th, 20 14 clearly stipulates that disputes arising from the signing and performance of contracts shall not be punished as contract fraud unless there is reliable and sufficient evidence to prove that the perpetrator aims at illegal possession. 20 14 12 3 1 day, the minutes of the symposium on handling criminal cases such as contract fraud were released, focusing on illegal possession. From the internal request system, we have reason to believe that we know the intention of the superior.
In addition, there are three judicial interpretations on the purpose of illegal possession, namely, 200 1 Summary of the Symposium on the Trial of Financial Crimes by National Courts, 2009 Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases of Impairment of Credit Card Management, and 2006 54 38+00 Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Illegal Fund-raising, which are similar to your summary.