First of all, there is no mathematics in both the LL.M. and the LL.M.
Secondly, the LL.M. is relatively easy to pass, with ****5 courses. The LL.M. in our school has 9 courses, which is relatively difficult.
The following are the differences and connections between the Master of Laws and the Master of Laws (Master of Laws):
The professional degree graduate education of Master of Laws was founded in 1995, with the first batch of enrollment in 1996 and 2000 The joint examination was started and limited to non-law candidates. It was established with the development of my country's rule of law in order to speed up the integration with international legal education and meet the society's demand for high-level legal talents.
Legal education is the most important component of our country’s education system.
The Master of Laws (JM for short) is only available to non-law major candidates and is not divided into specific majors. Its knowledge structure is broad-based, thick-founded, and comprehensive. It mainly cultivates high-level compound and applied legal talents, such as lawyers, judges, prosecutors and corporate legal consultants, for judicial, administrative law enforcement, legal services and legal supervision departments, social public institutions, and corporate management departments.
The professional master's degree in law mainly recruits law undergraduates, divided into legal theory, legal history, constitutional law and administrative law, criminal law, civil and commercial law, procedural law, economic law, international law and other majors, focusing on academic research , focusing on scientific research and teaching, cultivating high-level theoretical academic and legal talents for colleges and universities and scientific research institutions.
The difference between LL.M. The former are applied and compound senior legal talents, while the latter are academic and specialized senior legal talents.
In some Western countries with relatively sound rule of law, such as the United States, legal education takes place after university. Doctor of Laws. In the long run, with the development of legal education, the number of undergraduates in law will gradually decrease, and the Master of Laws will eventually be on an equal footing with the Master of Laws (LLM). Teaching and research talents should mainly be cultivated through J.D. education. As a degree that connects the past and the next, the Master of Laws will, on the one hand, provide talents for the legal practice community, and on the other hand, it will also provide a broad student base for J.D. education.
Secondly, the admissions requirements are different: the Master of Laws requires graduation from a non-law major, while the Master of Laws does not have this restriction.
The 13 legal majors that are not allowed to apply for the Master of Laws are: law, economic law, international law, international economic law, labor reform law, commercial law, notary, legal affairs, administrative law, lawyers, foreign economics and law , intellectual property law, criminal law.
Whether students with equivalent academic qualifications are admitted is stipulated by each school. The statement on the Internet that "the Master of Laws does not recruit students with equivalent academic qualifications" is wrong.
3. Admissions proposition methods, test difficulty, and test difficulty are different:
The public **** courses for the Master of Laws and the Master of Laws exams all participate in the national unified examination, but the Master of Laws The professional courses are national unified examinations (unified propositions and unified marking), and the Master of Laws is a separate proposition for each institution that is eligible to enroll.
The difficulty of taking the Master of Laws Professional Course Examination can be imagined; the Professional Course Examination of the Master of Laws is a national joint examination subject, with a unified examination syllabus, and standardized review materials have been formed, with limited difficulty .
Candidates for Master of Laws have not studied law before the exam and are on the same starting line. Because many candidates do not understand it, as a new thing, the current admission score is relatively low. If you reach the national level, you can apply and be admitted to prestigious schools. The score line is not much different from the national line, the admission rate is high, and the enrollment competition pressure is low. Candidates for Master of Laws are mostly law majors, and the competition is high. The proportion of candidates admitted to prestigious schools is as high as 1/20-50.
The pre-examination training for Master of Laws has matured. Candidates can greatly improve their competitiveness by participating in good training. The passing rate of candidates who participate in systematic training can reach more than 50%, and some can reach 70-80%.
But in fact, the training effect is not satisfactory.
But as more and more non-legal professionals are eager to join the legal industry, the difficulty of the Master of Laws entrance exam is also becoming more and more difficult!
4. Education is different: there are fixed tutors for the Master of Laws, the majors are divided more carefully, the research field generally has only one direction, and the research can develop in depth. The Master of Laws program is not divided into majors. After admission, you will mainly study current laws and regulations, focusing on practice and application. Tutors will be appointed after admission, and each tutor will lead a relatively large number of students.
For candidates who are not majoring in law, if they choose a more detailed professional direction from the beginning of studying law, it will not be conducive to their own development. Therefore, these two education methods depend on the starting point and background of the candidates. , is not the main difference.
Fifth, the future employment scenario and development potential are slightly different: Master of Laws VS Master of Laws
The employment scope of Master of Laws is much wider than that of Master of Laws, except for the employment of Master of Laws Outside the scope, the Master of Laws also cultivates management talents with high comprehensive quality for business management. In terms of legal practice, the Master of Laws is due to its inter-professional legal practice background. In legal practice, a Master of Laws, because of its cross-professional background, is more likely to give full play to its professional advantages in practical work and become an expert in a certain field. In legal teaching and research, studying for a Ph.D. is the only way, and a Master of Laws because of its Other professional backgrounds, which can combine the characteristics of this major in their research fields, seem to be no worse than the Master of Laws in dealing with the drawbacks. With the increase in the number of LL.M. graduates, the comprehensive abilities displayed by LL.M. graduates have been generally recognized. At the same time, due to the flaws in the single training model of LL.M., with the progress and development of society, the LL.M. replaced by training mode.
Reprinted from Science Park Law Master Examination Website www.fashuo365.com