The nanny arson case was retried on February 1 day. Is the delay caused by the intervention of Greentown?

Before answering this question, let's take a look at the facts: the nanny arson case occurred on June 26th, 20th17th, and the trial was held on February 22nd, 20th17th, but the defendant's defense lawyer Dang Linshan was interrupted due to jurisdictional objection. Since then, there have been several disturbances around the choice of Mo Huanjing's defense lawyer. Until 2065438+2008,65438+128 October, Mr. Lin sent a message to Weibo that he would file a new case in February 2065438+2008.

It can be seen from the facts that * * * has two waiting periods: 20 17.6.26- 12.22: waiting for the first court session, with an interval of about half a year. These six months include the following procedures: public security organs put on record for investigation; The procuratorate initiated a public prosecution; The court filed a case to arrange a hearing. As a major criminal case, six months to prepare for the first trial can be said to be a normal trial period. 2017.12.22-2018.2.1:waiting for the second hearing. The reason why there will be a second trial is because the defendant's lawyer Dang Linshan proposed to stop the trial and refused to support it, which led the court to find that he refused to defend the defendant and adjourned the court according to law.

So a direct answer is that the delay is not because of Greentown's intervention, but because of the defendant's lawyer. At the first trial, the defendant's lawyer asked for the designation of a different jurisdiction. To put it bluntly, this lawyer doesn't trust Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court and thinks there is something wrong with your investigation process. He asked the Supreme Court to appoint the Zhejiang Higher People's Court for trial, but at the time of trial, the Supreme People's Court didn't reply, and the defendant's lawyer felt that the jurisdiction of the case was undecided and should stop the trial. However, during the trial, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court also informed lawyers according to law that our court has jurisdiction. The lawyer refused to accept this reply and resigned himself. If the defendant has no defender as a result of this withdrawal, and the defendant who may be sentenced to death or life imprisonment has no state entrustment, he shall notify the legal aid institution to appoint a lawyer to defend him.

To put it bluntly, people who want to be sentenced to death or life must have defenders. So until now, I have a lawyer to continue the trial. Don't collude with everything, look at the laws and regulations. Of course, finally, I wish Mr. Lin good luck.