Yanzhou Court March 20 13 Judgment Mao Guangbing's Divorce Judgment

The questioner of this case should understand that the judgment is a divorce case. Then even if the name of the client is mentioned, it can't be found online. According to Article 6 of "Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on People's Courts Publishing Judgment Documents on the Internet", when people's courts publish judgment documents on the Internet, they should keep the true information such as the names of the parties, but the names of the following parties and litigation participants must be anonymously treated by symbol substitution.

(a) the parties to the marriage, family and inheritance disputes and their legal representatives;

(2) Victims in criminal cases and their legal representatives, witnesses and expert witnesses;

(3) A defendant who is sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years and exempted from criminal punishment and is not a recidivist or recidivist.

At the same time, if the questioner really has the right to know about the divorce case he mentioned. Then he can entrust a lawyer, or he can go to Yanzhou court to make an inquiry himself.