1. Other lawyers in the same firm are close relatives of the other party;
2. Other lawyers of the same firm are close relatives of the victim in this case;
3. The same law firm accepts other legal business entrusted by the other party in the litigation case represented by it;
4. There is a legal service relationship between the law firm and the client;
5. Within one year after the termination of the entrustment relationship, the lawyer accepts the entrustment of the other party who has an interest in the original client on the same legal matter;
6. Other circumstances that can be judged according to the lawyer's practice experience and industry common sense.
Avoidance can be divided into three types: voluntary avoidance, application avoidance and instruction avoidance. Active withdrawal refers to the active withdrawal of judges, prosecutors and investigators. Immunity from criminal proceedings in case of revocation of the law. Application for withdrawal refers to that the parties to the case and their legal representatives think that the judges, prosecutors and investigators have legal withdrawal situations and apply to their organs for withdrawal.
What methods can be avoided?
1. If a party applies for withdrawal, it shall explain the reasons and put forward it at the hearing; If the reasons for withdrawal are known after the trial of the case begins, they may also be put forward before the end of the court debate;
2. Self-avoidance. In case of legal withdrawal, relevant personnel can apply for withdrawal by themselves. After the application for withdrawal is filed, whether it is allowed or not shall be decided by the court.