1
The relevance between the WeChat chat records of both parties and the parties to this case, that is, the users of WeChat are all parties to this case. Because WeChat is not a real-name registration system, if the user of WeChat cannot be proved to be a party, the evidence of WeChat cannot be legally related to the case. At present, there are four ways to confirm the identity of WeChat users in judicial practice: 1. The other party admits; 2. Identification of WeChat avatar or WeChat photo album photos; 3. Tencent, a software supplier, assisted in the investigation; 4. Confirm by the association between the mobile phone number and the micro signal. It is worth noting that in practice, the latter two methods involve the third-party technical assistance of software supplier companies, and the process has not yet formed a benign operation in judicial practice, so it is still difficult in practical operation.
2
Integrity of wechat evidence. Wechat evidence is a fragmented record of life. If it is incomplete, it may be taken out of context and cannot reflect the complete true meaning of the parties. Therefore, in practice, WeChat evidence generally needs to be combined with other evidence, so that multiple evidences can form a complete evidence chain, and the proof points are consistent, which can greatly improve the probative power of evidence.