1. With the permission of the court, lawyers can ask questions to witnesses, experts and inspectors. Questioning witnesses, expert witnesses and inspectors shall not use words and methods that threaten, insult or improperly guide witnesses.
2. If the other party falsifies evidence, the lawyer can point it out at the stage of evidence cross-examination. If the other party insists, it can apply for authentication (such as forging its own signature) when necessary to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.
The court has a "cross-examination" procedure in the trial. In cross-examination, it is best to prepare the evidence of cross-examination, that is, the handwriting related to perjury, and ask the witness to be present. If the court does not accept the letter, it can take the protest channel or apply for bringing a lawsuit against the witness.
4. If it is really difficult for a party to submit evidence materials within the time limit for adducing evidence, it shall apply to the people's court for an extension of adducing evidence within the time limit for adducing evidence. With the permission of the people's court, the time limit for adducing evidence may be appropriately extended. If it is still difficult for the parties to submit evidence materials within the extended time limit for adducing evidence, they may apply for an extension again, and whether or not to grant it shall be decided by the people's court.
5. During cross-examination, the parties concerned shall question, explain and refute the authenticity, relevance and legality of the evidence and the probative force of the evidence.
6. Cross-examination shall be conducted in the following order: (1) The plaintiff presents evidence, and the defendant and the third party conduct cross-examination with the plaintiff; (2) The defendant produces evidence, and the plaintiff and the third party cross-examine the defendant; (3) The third party produces the evidence, and the plaintiff and defendant cross-examine with the third party.
7. The appraiser shall appear in court to accept the inquiry of the parties. If the appraiser is unable to appear in court for special reasons, he may, with the permission of the people's court, answer the questions of the parties in writing.
8. The parties may apply to the people's court for one or two persons with specialized knowledge to appear in court to explain the specialized issues of the case. If the people's court approves the application, the relevant expenses shall be borne by the applicant. Judges and parties may ask questions to people with specialized knowledge who appear in court. With the permission of the people's court, the personnel with specialized knowledge applied by the parties may cross-examine the problems in the case. People with professional knowledge can ask appraisers.
Matters needing attention
1. As evidence to prove the facts of the case, it must be true, relevant and legal. If the so-called "evidence" does not have the "three characteristics" at the same time, it cannot be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case.
2. In labor dispute cases, if a labor dispute occurs due to the decision of the employer to dismiss, remove from the list, expel, terminate the labor contract, reduce the labor remuneration, and calculate the working years of the workers, the employer shall bear the burden of proof.
3. Both the Civil Procedure Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court stipulate that the parties shall seek truth from facts in giving evidence and shall not forge or alter evidence. If a party forges evidence, he should not only bear the risk of losing the case, but also bear the legal risk of criminal responsibility (such as the crime of forging evidence).
4. The parties have the responsibility to provide evidence to prove the facts on which their claims are based or to refute the facts advocated by the other party. If there is no evidence or the evidence is insufficient to prove the facts identified by the parties, the parties with the burden of proof shall bear the adverse consequences.
5. If a party withdraws his recognition and obtains the consent of the other party before the end of the court debate, or there is sufficient evidence to prove that his recognition was made under coercion or major misunderstanding, which is inconsistent with the facts, the burden of proof of the other party cannot be exempted.
6. People who cannot express their will correctly cannot be witnesses.
The above is the relevant information compiled for everyone. If the person subjected to execution sells all his property that needs to be registered for transfer to a third party, and the third party has paid part or all of the price and actually occupies the property, but has not gone through the transfer registration formalities, the people's court may seal it up. If you have any other questions, please consult online.