The formation of interrogation transcripts violates the mandatory provisions of the law, and the witnesses did not appear in court to testify, etc., and cannot be used as evidence in civil cases. The inquiry transcripts of the investigative agencies do not belong to witness testimony in civil litigation. The term "witness testimony" in my country's Civil Procedure Law refers to the statement made by the witness to the people's court in order to understand the facts of the case. The interrogation record is a record of the investigation conducted by the investigative agency on the parties in order to ascertain the facts of the case during the handling of the case. Although the record contains the signatures and fingerprints of the parties, the record is the record of the investigative agency and not the people's court. Therefore, it The transcript does not comply with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law.
Legal basis
Article 63 of the "Civil Procedure Law" Evidence includes (1) statements of the parties; (2) documentary evidence; (3) physical evidence; (4) audio-visual materials; (5) Electronic data; (6) Witness testimony; (7) Appraisal opinions; (8) Investigation records. Evidence must be verified before it can be used as a basis for determining facts.