He will be sentenced to death and must compensate the victim's family. 1. Arrested after injuring someone with a gun
A vicious wounding accident occurred in Sichuan that resulted in death. The suspect fled to the mountains after the murder. After more than ten hours of pursuit, the local police finally found him in a remote place. Corner captures it. Currently, the suspect is under control and his trial is about to be concluded.
It is understood that the murderer killed the victim with a homemade pistol, and the reason for the murder was just a trivial contradiction. II. There is a high possibility of being sentenced to death
I think there is a high possibility that this murderer will be sentenced to death because he is charged with multiple crimes.
The first is intentional homicide. This person intentionally killed someone just because he had a disagreement with someone, and has violated the crime of intentional homicide in the criminal law. Based on the analysis of previous similar cases, he may be sentenced to death.
There is also the crime of knowingly possessing a firearm. There are clear restrictions on guns in our country. Except for special personnel who can hold guns, anyone else who holds a gun is guilty of intentionally possessing a gun, so he will be sentenced to more than 10 years in prison.
The man's homemade gun has violated the law, and using a gun to kill someone is an added crime, and he is likely to be sentenced to death. 3. Compensation to the victim’s family
Even if he is sentenced to death, the man still needs to make financial compensation to the victim’s family. It is understood that the victim is a middle-aged man with two underage children. The murderer needs to be responsible for the living expenses and study expenses of the two children until they are 18 years old. If the victim’s parents are still alive, the murderer also needs to bear part of the pension. cost. 4. Criticism at the social and moral level
Punishment at the legal level is inevitable, and there will be no shortage of criticism at the moral level. Because of a verbal dispute with someone, the man held a grudge and killed the other person with cruel means, which is enough to show that the man was narrow-minded, cold-blooded and cruel. The social impact he caused was very bad, violated social ethics, and should be criticized by the public.
What kind of punishment do you think this man should receive? Please leave a message in the comment area below to tell me!