Which is more serious, Lao Lai transferring property or hiding property?

Both of these acts are illegal. The property information of the executed person is very important in the execution procedure, which often determines whether the execution can achieve the expected effect. In real life, many "Lao Lai" evade execution by transferring property. After his account was frozen, the person subjected to execution opened a new bank card in the name of his relatives and used the bank account to engage in business activities. After receiving the money, he refused to declare his property to the court. This is a typical act of evading execution, and it belongs to the situation of being able to perform and refusing to perform. If the circumstances are serious, criminal responsibility should be investigated according to law. This behavior of hiding property by borrowing households is a typical evasive execution behavior, which belongs to the situation of being able to perform and refusing to perform, and the circumstances are serious. On the one hand, subjectively, it has the intention of hiding property and evading court execution. On the other hand, objectively, it also makes it impossible for the court to verify its real property, which leads to the court's inability to execute effective judgments and rulings and seriously damages the interests of creditors.

In the practice of expanding information, there are various forms of evading execution, which are usually manifested as the person subjected to execution hiding property, fictitious debts or hiding, transferring or disposing of the property available for execution in other ways; Refusing to hand over or conceal, destroy or forge financial accounting vouchers or balance sheets and other relevant materials; Transferring property by false litigation or arbitration; Fictitious priority creditor's rights or application for participation in distribution; The intermediary agency provides false certification documents or the documents provided are materially untrue; The person subjected to execution, the guarantor and the obligor for assistance have the ability to execute and refuse to execute or refuse to assist in execution, etc. When the person subjected to execution is found to have evaded execution, the lawyer can collect evidence from five aspects: whether he has the qualification of refusing to execute, whether he has the ability to execute, whether he has the obligation to execute, whether he refuses to execute, and whether the circumstances are serious, so as to judge whether the person subjected to execution constitutes the crime of refusing to execute the judgment or ruling.

The Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Ruling Criminal Cases clearly states that there are eight situations that belong to Item 5 of Article 313 of the Interpretation of the NPC Standing Committee, namely, "refusing to execute when the circumstances are serious": 1, refusing to report or falsely report property, violating the people's court's restrictions on high consumption and related consumption orders, and refusing to do so after taking compulsory measures such as fines or detention. 2. Forging or destroying important evidence about the performance ability of the person subjected to execution, preventing others from testifying by means of violence, threat or bribery, or instigating, bribing or coercing others to commit perjury, which makes it impossible for the people's court to find out the property status of the person subjected to execution and makes the judgment or ruling unenforceable; 3. Refusing to deliver the property and tickets determined by legal documents, or refusing to move out of the house or land, which makes the judgment or ruling unenforceable; 4. Collusion with others, obstructing the execution through false litigation, false arbitration, false reconciliation, etc., which makes the judgment or ruling unenforceable; 5. Using violence or threats to prevent the executors from entering the execution site, or gathering people to make trouble or impact the execution site, so that the execution work cannot be carried out; 6. Insulting, besieging, detaining or beating the executors, which makes execution impossible; 7, damage, rob the execution of case materials, vehicles and other execution equipment, execution personnel clothing and official documents, resulting in the execution of the work can not be carried out; 8. Refusing to execute the judgment or ruling of the court, causing great losses to creditors.